I’ve been following your discussion Bruce and Peter. I think the preponderance of evidence is with Bruce and the environment. Seems there has to be an over-reaction to get the Corporation’s and the public’s attention. Under react and the scene is set for greater risk-taking and more serious environmental disasters. And maybe what we are seeing now is not an over reaction, but an understatement of short and long run damage. I don’t have a clue what a giant plume of crude moving out to sea on ocean currents does to coral reefs, wildlife, fisheries, the beaches and to the economy . But then I don’t think anyone else knows either. My intuition tells me this cannot be good. Make em pay so it never happens again.
I’ve been following your discussion Bruce and Peter. I think the preponderance of evidence is with Bruce and the environment. Seems there has to be an over-reaction to get the Corporation’s and the public’s attention. Under react and the scene is set for greater risk-taking and more serious environmental disasters. And maybe what we are seeing now is not an over reaction, but an understatement of short and long run damage. I don’t have a clue what a giant plume of crude moving out to sea on ocean currents does to coral reefs, wildlife, fisheries, the beaches and to the economy . But then I don’t think anyone else knows either. My intuition tells me this cannot be good. Make em pay so it never happens again.