Advertisement

Steve Benson for February 24, 2010

9 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 10 years ago

    It’s a pretty conservative bill, actually – it says more about the true “Party of No” attitude of the Republicans that voted against it than it says about the content of the bill.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    kennethcwarren64  over 10 years ago

    ANDANDY – First you scream that the problem is that we need to create more jobs, then you scream that it’s going to cost money.

    If Cheney/Bush were in still in charge you would be so happy, everything would so fine, it would be 2008 all over again.

     •  Reply
  3. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma Premium Member over 10 years ago

    Economists on BOTH political sides have said the only problem with the “stimulus” was it being too small, but it IS WORKING! Now the gray beasts have voted FOR a jobs bill.

    go figure.

     •  Reply
  4. Cheryl 149 3
    Justice22  over 10 years ago

    I thought elephants walked by moving their legs on the same side, etc. Don’t know the term for it. Hey Doc!

     •  Reply
  5. Ys
    HabaneroBuck  over 10 years ago

    “Jobs bill”…pretty sure the whole point of conservatism is to let the economic engine do its thing, and let the political spectrum do its thing….fascism is the correct term for a government that controls the “jobs” market. Private-public partnerships = fascism. Look it up…

    Just in principal alone, dtrout, no true Rightie thinks the “stimulus” was too small! Please! And, we hate false nomenclature like “stimulus” and “jobs”. You know, as in, “what, are you guys actually against a ‘JOBS’ bill?”

     •  Reply
  6. Wombat wideweb  470x276 0
    4uk4ata  over 10 years ago

    Technically, HabaneroBuck, that might be more of a libertarian thing. Conservatism is more of a “traditional values” outlook, and it does not necessarily imply a fixed economic viewpoint - a Russian, German and American conservative might have very different ideas about what the role of the state in the market should be.

    And if public-private interaction was fascism, then pretty much every president from FDR until Carter was a fascist. I didn’t know the axis won ;) . Historically, yes, Mussolini had public-private partnerships (and was a firm believer in corporatism), but so did nearly every country at the time, except probably the USSR - they didn’t have any private business to partner with.

    Well, I guess that while the CBO considered the stimulus to have resulted in a lot of jobs being created/kept, you know better, right?

     •  Reply
  7. Winter
    Imajs  over 10 years ago

    It is called a jobs bill, but it extends unemployment which is not a job. How about telling the truth?

     •  Reply
  8. New avatar
    MurphyHerself  over 10 years ago

    Trouble is, we don’t have the money to pay for it no matter who votes for it.

     •  Reply
  9. Buddy
    lalas  over 10 years ago

    RE: Brown, were the righties expecting MA to elect an R like Palin? Duh.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Steve Benson

Advertisement