Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal by Zach Weinersmith for January 13, 2016

  1. Idano
    Ida No  over 8 years ago

    Man: "Descartes’ “I think…”"Woman: “I think not.”

     •  Reply
  2. Ted4th
    seismic-2 Premium Member over 8 years ago

    I love a meta-conversation!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Stephen Gilberg  over 8 years ago

    “Do you know about Heisenberg?” “Maybe.”

     •  Reply
  4. Deficon
    Coyoty Premium Member over 8 years ago

    “How about Schrödinger?”“Yes and no.”

     •  Reply
  5. Idano
    Ida No  over 8 years ago

    Not true. Schrodinger is saying that both states exist simultaneously. It’s not a question of not knowing the outcome, but that according to the math both outcomes are equally true and that you can’t predict one or the other until you make the observation. The cat is simultaneously alive and dead.

     •  Reply
  6. Keaton
    fredd13  over 8 years ago

    Doesn’t work; text isn’t infinitely sub-divisible. There are only a finite number of characters in any description of the paradox, so after a finite number of divisions you must inevitably end up with a single character (the first) to read. You can’t “half-read” that, so at that point Xeno ceases to apply. After which, by a similar argument, you must then read the next one. And so on, until you have completed the text (without so much as the aid of the mathematics of infinite series).

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal