Man: This is what happens when a government makes massive spending cuts that hurt the already disenfranchised! GOP: Uh, oh!
Stay tuned, Dumb(o).
The elephant may hear the words people in other countries say…but they are quite good at ignoring whatever they want. Until it actually happens here they won’t believe it will ever happen.
@Harleyquinn“Just a quick question who left a bigger mess on the mall after a rally? A Tea party rally or any o the D’s rallies?”__Do you have a source you would be willing to share so we could all be enlightened?
Sheeesh, the comments… s (aka “puppy”) claimed …in the socialist country of the UK everyone is assigned a job… Ye gawds, I was assigned a job? @@ Trolling, puppy? I was wondering when someone here would pick on the rioting in England; it’s only been 5 nights. :-| The protests may have had some merit the first 5 hours when it was still peaceful and led by the Duggan family & his supporters who were seeking clarification into his fatal shooting by the police. However, what kicked off afterwards soon began to defy initial explanations & descriptors such as “disenchanted youths”, “unemployed youths”, “results of spending cuts”, etc. Certainly a symptom of what we call the “underclass” though. Although it is proving a little tricky explaining this just as a symptom of disenfranchisement etc since not only the poor have participated in the riots, looting, arson & deaths. We’ve had folks from age 12 & up, all social classes, employments (& unemployment) and backgrounds But I think adding these opportunists clouds the picture of who are in the overwhelming majority of folks participating in the rioting & looting: the new underclass.
Absolutely right! Also, who created this “disenfranchised” bunch of malcontents, many of whom have never had a productive moment in their entire lives? Collective progressives have developed this mindless hoard that threatens communities.
Rogers doesn’t know jack about anything. One minute he’s casting thuggish maniacal aspersions at “tea partiers,” and the next he’s doing so towards the “disenfranchised” (i.e. those—typically Democrat voters— who have been made dependent upon big government for their livelihood).
So, Rogers is OBVIOUSLY declaring that if cuts are made towards the subsidized impoverished, that they will take to the streets and burn the very means of their existence. I know that wasn’t his intent, but then again Rob Rogers is an idiot.
April 12, 2017
July 06, 2017
July 23, 2017