Robert Ariail for June 09, 2016

At least the elephant is big enough to haul that stack of stones that Trump packs.

She has more votes but is NOT liked?

It seems only fair the GOP should be lugging that rock. They made it, particle by particle, and it goes away when they stop talking.

That millstone should read “GOP Make-em-ups” and it is made of Styrofoam. Unless there is any proof of any of the garbage people are posting about her, there is no substance. And Trump won’t release his millstone. And we aren’t allowed to talk about W’s millstone. and Reagan’s millstone.. well, we’re all still living with those.

What seems strange to me is that, while I do not like the fact the Clinton is in favor of American neoliberalism** and neoconservatism, the GOP favors these policies and must go beyond ideologies to find personal reasons to attack her … why?Clinton, more likely than Trump, would preserve the status-quo with the added advantage that she could be blamed for it’s failure … puzzling!**Hayek’s neoliberal model described in “The Road to Serfdom” (1944) was a mix of anti-trust regulation to encourage competition together with the need for a strong social network as opposed to Reagan’s over-simplified “trickle down” model.

Nice ladies don’t make history.

HAHA! She is soooo gonna lose!

OldCoalIt goes back even farther. They attacked her for “I am not one to stay home, bake cookies, and stand by my man…”, yet when she did, they attacked her for that. GOP, always on the offense because they are always offensive.

How many more died in Viet Nam when Nixon sent representatives to interfere with the Johnson administrations efforts to end the war.{Political ambition—or as some might call it when it comes to Richard Nixon, treason—prolonged the war in Vietnam for half a decade.}(conservative play this game over and over for political advantage, even more currently.)

And almost 3,000 died on American soil because W wouldn’t listen to several warnings that terrorist would attack on our soil using planes. But we don’t talk about past presidents anymore. Or, has the ban lifted and we can discuss what W did now?

Maybe everything in the cartoon is true. Let’s say it is. Now, compare “problems with honesty, secrecy, likeability” to the “racism, thuggery, cluelessness, misogyny etc.” of her opponent.Or, as many have pointed out here in response to an early parrot, and despite rethuglican problems with basic reasoning skills, “Benghazi” is not just a difficult way to spell “Iraq.”