Reality Check by Dave Whamond for September 21, 2018


Hide All Comments
  1. Face
    RetFor  6 months ago

    Missing a bit of the human part, there. A proper one of this type is more useful, though, if less appealing. Although, then I guess you gotta worry about babies. Don’t need a school of babies following me around. And I guess there’s still things you can do with the classic one. Probably best to stick with those…

     •  Reply
  2. Intergalactic hussy
    Intergalactic Hussy Premium Member 6 months ago

    A fish top and girl bottom were just what Fry wanted when he married that mermaid in Atlanta, the wedding night being unfulfilling as she was.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    whataboytjiex2  6 months ago

    DR. Darwin I presume?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    gary  6 months ago

    I guess its a Manmer or Manmaid?

     •  Reply
  5. Portrait
    TossedSaladCartoon  6 months ago

    Didn’t Family Guy do this?

     •  Reply
  6. Copy of msg apa181
    The Brooklyn Accent  6 months ago

    He was hoping to get a little tail.

     •  Reply
  7. Img 1620
    joefearsnothing  6 months ago

    …expecting or praying for Daryl Hannah! ;o}

     •  Reply
  8. Img 20171213 180229
    LoveBritTV Premium Member 6 months ago

    Reminds me of Cat’s dream “girl” in Red Dwarf.

     •  Reply
  9. Leprechaun icon
    Zen-of-Zinfandel  6 months ago

    The old man and his gill-friend.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    AtariDragon  6 months ago

    Miss Innsmouth 1936.

     •  Reply
  11. I yam who i yam
    Kind&Kinder  6 months ago

    It’s o.k., guys, it’s just a fluke!

     •  Reply
  12. Color maria yoshiwara 226x300
    librisleo  6 months ago

    Lindemann’s Catch from Night Gallery. Find the full episode on youtube.

     •  Reply
  13. 100 1379
    reneed_dlw  6 months ago

    He’s a “Fish-or-Man”, not a “Fisherman”.

     •  Reply
  14. Img 0359
    Gale Premium Member 6 months ago

    ‘But check out my pecs.’

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Reality Check