Recent Comments

1. 1 day ago on Robert Ariail

   First, you overstated the number of jobs by 10,000. The Keystone Pipeline would employ some 1000 construction workers for a limited time followed by roughly 100 maintenance and service personnel, not worth the potential environmental risk. Second, remember that the pipeline was originally designed to pass near Bismark, but the mostly, Euro-American residents fought it on the grounds that it might endanger THEIR drinking water so they rerouted the pipeline over Native Indian lands with sensitive watershed. However, the pipeline happened to also cross ranchers’ lands who had more political pull, so they all fought the pipeline together. Three: oil sands oil extraction is environmentally destructive to begin with. Four: oil prices are at an all-time low making oil sands extraction extremely unprofitable, so this whole exercise is moot. This was an idiotic boondoggle from the start.

2. 1 day ago on Tim Campbell

   …until it wasn’t.

3. 8 days ago on Mike Luckovich

   Oh, do go on! My schadenfreude tank still has room! Trump is the anti-Midas: everything he touches turns to manure!

4. 8 days ago on Robert Ariail

   I believe the correct term is “Reactionary.”

5. 9 days ago on Nick and Zuzu

   …and does not kill fast enough.

6. 9 days ago on Mike Luckovich

   Cruz and Hawley were a tad, bit, too late. Nice knowin’ ya’! NOT!

7. 9 days ago on Robert Ariail

   That’s called “PTSD.” Hopefully, enough of our representatives were freaked out enough to never, ever, let this happen again…

8. 9 days ago on Sarah's Scribbles

   More plants!

9. 9 days ago on Bad Reporter

   Remember the GOP C-blocking Obama for four years? What a waste of time!

10. 9 days ago on Bad Reporter

    Ooh, Boo-Boo, get your feelings hurt? Separating families and putting children in cages wasn’t enough?