Recent Comments

1. almost 9 years ago on Matt Davies

   The difference is that Corporations only use your data to attempt to sell you more stuff. You are not mandated to “opt in”, nor are you mandated to “buy more stuff”.The Government uses your data to entrap you. You are mandated to “opt in” and you are mandated to buy whatever they’re selling.

2. almost 9 years ago on Glenn McCoy

   It doesn’t matter. They’re all for a horse race between Clinton and Sanders, and for the time being they’d prefer Sanders because they’re Socialists at heart.. When they realize that despite their best efforts Sanders doesn’t pan out because the majority of Democrats don’t want an openly Socialist as their nominee (much to my dismay), they’ll endorse Hillary in the Democratic Primaries. While they endorse someone unelectable like Bush or Graham in the Republican Primaries. Then they’ll endorse Clinton again in the General. They do this every election cycle. If you’ve been paying attention, it’s their modus operandi

3. almost 9 years ago on Darrin Bell

   That’s not really much of a rebuttal. I’ve confirmed at least one of those points on wiki, and I wasn’t even researching them.BTW, I’ve spoken with both Roy Innis and his son Niger, and they ain’t too thrilled with the NAACP, either.

4. almost 9 years ago on Dan Wasserman

   Don’t worry, Hillary. You’ve never looked like a Centrist. Or even a liberal. You’ve always looked like a Saul Alinsky Progressive.""You know, (liberal) is a word that originally meant that you were for freedom … that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual," she said at the CNN/YouTube debate. “Unfortunately, in the last 30, 40 years, it has been turned up on its head, and it’s been made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its meaning was in the 19th and early 20th century.” She continued: “I prefer the word ‘progressive,’ which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive.”“In her thesis, Hillary quoted Alinsky as explaining the difference between a liberal and a radical: “The liberal refuses to fight for the goals he professes.”I’m sure Hillary still sees herself today as a “radical.” But she [and I would add the rest of the “Progressives”] could never use that term and remain viable. So she [and the rest of the “Progressives”] has adopted another term — “progressive” — which means the same thing to those in the know.What is a Progressive?

5. almost 9 years ago on [Deleted]

   That would be bigamy. McCain and Graham are already married.

6. almost 9 years ago on ViewsMidEast

   As Prior Military, I assume you’re familiar with the axiom “Never underestimate your enemy” ~ Sun Tsu, The Art of War

7. almost 9 years ago on ViewsAmerica

   Quite different from Patton’s philosophy:The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.

8. almost 9 years ago on Gary Varvel

   Once again, liberals ignore that what Bush signed was an interim Status of Forces Agreement. That’s why the first thing Obama did upon taking office was send Biden to re-negotiate the Status of Forces Agreement. Since Obama had no inclination to keep troops in Iraq whatsoever, this negotiation was a farce. The first time Maliki said “No” Biden was on his plane traveling back to the US.BTW, I must have read a dozen times on here today how Obama ended the War in Iraq. And another dozen times how Bush signed the SOFA and Obama had no choice. That would mean Bush ended the War in Iraq. Which is it libbies? It can’t be both.

9. almost 9 years ago on Scott Stantis

   Since you seem totally unaware that gun mortality is the lowest in decades I’ll just assume you’re equally unaware that a politician, or group of politicians, can’t just decree what you want. There is a process for Amending the Constitution. You can try it if you please, but it won’t be popular, and will be defeated,

10. almost 9 years ago on Marshall Ramsey

    Your post has absolutely nothing to do with the Iowa Straw poll, and at this stage of the game, with few voters knowing who any of these people are (except Hillary and perhaps Bush), it’s pretty meaningless.