Missing large

timsoft Free

Recent Comments

  1. 3 days ago on Tarzan

    snake if it is coils

  2. 5 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    thats because from both sides you like what you “think” the other person is like, but want to “polish” up a few areas to your way. how you both learn to live with who the person really is, and how you learn to please each through being willing to change and valuing the relationship more than some less important things is what develops and changes you both into less self absorbed people.

  3. 10 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    although people change, marriage is about a commitment through that change to each other, and a willingess to be more than just individuals living together. Marriages fail when the commitment fails on at least one side, or if it starts without that commitment.

  4. 10 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    in the UK, if you life with someone for at least 2years as a couple then you have the same rights as if you were married.

  5. 11 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    wating till 30 is ok, but if you want kids, there is a ticking biological clock to think about. The commitment logic is not that sound though. The number of people who live together for many years and don’t get married because of worries of commitment is a shame. They don’t realise that they are not protecting themselves from any hurt if things didn’t work out, and after a couple of years in the eyes of the law they have the same rights as married people anyway.

  6. 26 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    gizmocat: hijab covers head/and face. no-one preposed that. that is just a lack of valuing women. if sexy means emphasing and bringing the eyes/gaze to the breast, then it is signalling to men to look at them. the definition of sexy (attractive for sex) – look in any dictionary, is something that if not just for a partner, specifically implies what I said in my previous comment. liz doesn’t understand the definition either, and thinks that she will attact only the attention of guys she is interested in, not guys she is not attracted to, but , as they say in marketing, sex sells. She can be pretty without selling sex, and as she is “under-age” her father is just doing his job. There is a fine line between sexy and pretty, but obvious revealing of breasts by clothing in the bustier is fairly clear cut, to pardon the pun. it’s called flaunting for a good reason. That’s why so many pop-stars, actresses, fasion mags, youtube thumbnails etc use it, it sells.

  7. 28 days ago on For Better or For Worse

    she doesn’t understand that by showing off her breasts, she will attract guys, but not for her personality; and finding that someone likes her for her boobs, but would be just as happy with someone elses, is something her dad would want to shield her from. If a relationship just consists of physical lust it will never last because of aging. Also these days, it signals a relaxed view of casual coitus to guys, whether she realises it or not, why else would she be showing off her “wears.” her dad would also want to protect her from the lack of any commitment that entails.

  8. about 2 months ago on B.C.

    dark side and light side?

  9. 2 months ago on The Argyle Sweater

    not as interesting as kintyre in scotland

  10. 4 months ago on The Argyle Sweater

    the men were from the east, (matt2v1) so they were heading west. simple mistake having them going the wrong direction.