As a Union Rep, I would support the administration on the grounds of theft. I would also require the admin to “prove” that it was theft and not utilized for a legitimate purpose. There’s no denying that “petty crimes” have a HUGE impact on the work place budget … but the expense of internal surveillance cameras is also more than basic integrity!
A second clue sits on the table … the items appear to be arranged for the use of two people: toast and drink by one chair, paper in front of a chair at a 90’ angle.
As a Union Rep, I would support the administration on the grounds of theft. I would also require the admin to “prove” that it was theft and not utilized for a legitimate purpose. There’s no denying that “petty crimes” have a HUGE impact on the work place budget … but the expense of internal surveillance cameras is also more than basic integrity!