At this point everyone knows the two sides of the divide: a country with reference to God (Christian Republic), or a country with no reference to God (Socialist Dictatorship).
How do you figure that? The free market limits the population of these areas by huge insurance costs for those who take the risk. FEMA is the guarantor of the stupid rebuilding.
Difference of opinion. To me, ANYONE who wants federal government control over the health of the People is a wild-eyed radical on this issue.
Anyone who wants government usurpation of the Constitutional role of the People to oversee their own health, education, and welfare IS a wild-eyed radical. That is the definition of American socialism. So FDR was one and Bernie is one.
I understand. I am just giving you the definition meant by Average Joe Conservative American. Which I think would be helpful to those who actually want to understand Average Joe Conservative American, and not portray him falsely by definitions from other cultures and times that do not apply to him. Socialism (man is his own god politics) is different in every country because every country springs from a different Constitution. Chinese socialism is different from Soviet socialism is different from Italian socialism. America is unique in her freedoms. They are vast because of the powers left in the hands of the People by her Constitution. So American Socialism is vast in definition because it takes away these vast freedoms. It is the most tragic form of Socialism in the world.
American socialism is the federal usurping of powers given to the People by the Constitution. These powers include health, education, and welfare. Since most non-conservatives are happy with the federal government having these powers, “socialist” fits them.
I say it’s “my understanding” because I am open to the fact that I may be wrong. I believe that is the general way it is understood.
Don’t know fb either, but even if they don’t receive an unfriend notification, won’t they know they are unfriended when they no long have access to your page?
I figured mass bombing do not occur here as often because guns are more readily available. And mass murderers do not care if privately-owned bombs are illegal. I thought bombs were easy to make – like the Boston ones, but I am no expert.
But it is a lot easier to kill 300 people with a bomb than an assault rifle. Do you want mass murders to be forced to be more creative?