Recent Comments

1. over 13 years ago on B.C.

   prfessor, the problem with your argument is is assumes it only applies one way. That can’t be true. Assuming that hard, physical evidence is required to prove something, then, according to the same rule, lack of hard, physical evidence does not disprove it. In fact, hard, physical evidence is also required to disprove anything (i.e. prove the inverse). Lack of evidence doesn’t actually prove anything, it just makes it unproven.

2. over 13 years ago on B.C.

   GR88, it isn’t the quantity of rain Seattle is famous for, it is the frequency.

3. over 13 years ago on Wizard of Id

   For the edification of the early posters, although “car” is usually thought to be synonymous will “automobile,” the word has been around a lot longer than they. According to Merriam-Webster: car - 1: a vehicle moving on wheels.

4. over 13 years ago on Calvin and Hobbes

   I don’t see Mom explaining how it works. And just because she pays the electric company, that doesn’t prove anything. Magicians get paid too.

5. almost 14 years ago on B.C.

   I hope she wasn’t on the nest when that happened.

6. almost 14 years ago on Calvin and Hobbes

   From inscrutable to corporal between one frame and the next.

   Lewreader, how did the next roast taste?

7. almost 14 years ago on Wizard of Id

   There is some evidence that native Americans had doughnuts prior to occupation by us. So they invented them, or at least did so independently of others. I like this idea. Native Americans (North and South) were very creative with what they ate, drank and smoked. Witness popcorn, chocolate milk, coffee, tobacco…

8. almost 14 years ago on Wizard of Id

   That would taste awful!

9. almost 14 years ago on B.C.

   Very punny, though they could have I done without the allusion to Alton Brown.

10. almost 14 years ago on Calvin and Hobbes

    I noticed that too, Mr Mirage. In my reality, swtiching sides of the bed just doesn’t happen. I’m beginning to think this may be fiction.