Advertisement
Advertisement

Pearls Before Swine for Aug 24, 2014

Aug 23, 2014
Small u 201701251613
Pearls Before Swine for Aug 24, 2014 Comic Strip
Aug 25, 2014
Small u 201701251613
  1. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  almost 4 years ago

    Stephan Pastis is the master of sarcastic humor.

     •  Reply  • 
  2. Scribble can
    Three Steps Over Japan  almost 4 years ago

    Stephan Pastis is a former lawyer. Sarcastic humor comes with the job.

     •  Reply  • 
  3. Missing large
    reatta45  almost 4 years ago

    LOVE the accurate political quips… Just wish more people could understand how this works.

     •  Reply  • 
  4. Noh8 tw
    socalvillaguy GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Love it!

     •  Reply
  5. Hercules club
    Alexikakos  almost 4 years ago

    Here’s Harry McClintock’s take on paradise…

     •  Reply
  6. E067 169 48
    Darsan54 GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    One of the better political commentaries I have seen in recent memory.

     •  Reply  • 
  7. Thinker
    Sisyphos  almost 4 years ago

    You can take the Cartoon-Boy out of the bar, but you can’t take the bar out of Cartoon-Boy. I want some gumdrops! Or a unicorn! If I don’t get them, I may sue you for fraud, Cartoon-Boy!

     •  Reply
  8. Zoso1
    Arianne  almost 4 years ago

    Look closely at panels 3 and 5 – our two faced congressional rat is showing his true nature. If you cover up his left half, you sort of see a profile on the right. Nicely done, Stephan!

     •  Reply
  9. Zoso1
    Arianne  almost 4 years ago

    If I listen long enough to you I’d find the way to believe that it’s all true Knowing that you lied straight face while I cried

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    doublepaw  almost 4 years ago

    Seems like for once Pastis took the other non-conservative side with his political statements.

     •  Reply
  11. Breaking bad logo
    Newrulz1951  almost 4 years ago

    Too bad that this wasn’t available to show the goofballs on the SCOTUS before the 5 idiots make their stupid decision on Citizens United.

     •  Reply
  12. Grandpa hef
    Jeff0811  almost 4 years ago

    A word on the comic itself, Money influences me to get up and go to work every business day, it influences lawyers to be lawyers, and then some of those lawyers to run for political office. For a politician to say money doesn’t influence people by someone who was influenced by money to hold political office is the height of hypocrisy.

     •  Reply
  13. 51f3ffc4c856111fb4000082 736
    Already Fuzzy  almost 4 years ago

    Best. Pearls Before Swine. Ever

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    gzitver  almost 4 years ago

    Rat for Congress!

     •  Reply
  15. Tarot
    Nighthawks GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    the rats are already there, gerrymandered to stay there, no matter what

     •  Reply
  16. Ronald reagan
    OldestandWisest  almost 4 years ago

    Yeah, freedom of speech is SO overrated, government really need to restrict it more. After all, they’re the government and they’re here to help us!

     •  Reply
  17. Calvplay   2
    mentor397  almost 4 years ago

    This is totally wrong. Gumdrops come from bushes, not trees.

     •  Reply
  18. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  almost 4 years ago

    and there are no cats in America!

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    Dianne Lee GC Insider almost 4 years ago
    The only thing that is going to save the Middle Class is the Middle Class. We are the 99%—- that means we have the votes to elect people who will actually represent middle class workers and provide a safety net for those who are trying to get into the middle class.We all need to know who is supporting the candidates. That is who they will be working for. They have no choice if they want to stay in office. You have to do the bidding of whoever is paying your way, just the same as we all do in our jobs. So, before going to vote, look it up on the internet. Open Secrets is a good site, but there are plenty.If the candidate is getting their money from small donors or from unions, they are going to be working for middle class working people. If their donations are from corporations or from 1%ers, that’s who their votes are going to be working for. They are not going to go against them and do anything to help the middle class.It would be political suicide.
     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    adssteve  almost 4 years ago

    Brilliant. Period.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    oldschool434  almost 4 years ago

    Bring back the crocs

     •  Reply
  22. 001
    Queen of America GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    The strip should be posted on every single politicians’ office wall.

     •  Reply
  23. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  almost 4 years ago

    IF a corporation is a person, then it must necessarily have multiple personality disorder!

     •  Reply
  24. Vlad2
    Oxnate  almost 4 years ago

    I wish they’d call a spade a spade and just rename ‘campaign contributions’, bribes.

     •  Reply
  25. Arloandjanis
    John Czach GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    So ? you join a like minded pac and match the fat cat. and there’s no fatter cats than unions with coerced dues. Of,course, the fallacy of this strip is that extrapolating the logic would mean that there is never any elected official you agree with

     •  Reply
  26. Pig
    A_NY_Outlaw  almost 4 years ago

    Rat the Politician. There’s a marriage made in heaven.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    bshamblin79  almost 4 years ago

    I knew Candyland was real!

     •  Reply
  28. Img 0041
    Dapperdan61  GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Today’s comic should be put in every elected officials office. This strip speaks volumes about the influence money has on what drives legislation. Regardless of party affiliation all politicians are beholden to those who donate to their campaigns.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    Timothy Madigan GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    sigh!

    McCutheon v. FEC wasnt about per-candidate spending limits, which HAVE been upheld but the limits on spending across candidates nationwide.you’re still restricted on how much you can give but not how many you can give to

     •  Reply
  30. 1899lsu avatar
    YatInExile GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    It’s not often that I laugh at the first panel of a strip.

     •  Reply
  31. Attitude on lap
    cactusjack99 GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Good one Steve, you nailed it!

     •  Reply
  32. N1495118875 241922 2408
    Ermine Notyours  almost 4 years ago

    The main expense of political campaigns is television advertising. Commercially-supported television seems to be declining, so there’s hope. If commercial television declines to a low enough levels, politicians won’t be able to accept large “campaign contributions” with a straight face, but I may not live long enough to see that day. Local news seems to be doing okay, so it may take a while.One time when I was forced to watch local news at work, I saw a pro-candidate X ad, followed by an anti-candidate X ad followed by a pro-candidate X’s opponent ad. I was getting whiplash from all these messages. It’s no surprise that political ads contribute so much to local television and radio stations, but it’s not a sustainable model.

     •  Reply
  33. Monty avatar
    steverinoCT  almost 4 years ago

    Pastis shoulfd credit TBogg:Your Mumia Sweatshirt Won’t Get You Into Heaven Anymore

     •  Reply
  34. Missing large
    Chrisstopher  almost 4 years ago

    Unfortunately, I don’t think It’s simplified enough for most people to understand.

     •  Reply
  35. Eye darker
    Nairebis  almost 4 years ago

    While I agree with the idea that money is corrupting, it’s worth giving the additional context of the Supreme Court’s ruling. There is a reason for what they said:

    “The line between quid pro quo corruption and general influence must be respected in order to safeguard basic First Amendment rights, and the Court must err on the side of protecting political speech rather than suppressing it.”

    So the point isn’t that the Supreme Court believes money doesn’t influence politicians, it’s that the Supreme Court gives a lot of weight to not suppressing the freedom of speech of the people.

     •  Reply
  36. Img 0946
    WineStar GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Follow the money.

    Spot on & well done, SP!

     •  Reply
  37. Pig
    A_NY_Outlaw  almost 4 years ago

    You can see by the thread that Pastis has stirred up trouble! ;-)

     •  Reply
  38. Banner en
    Robert Pratt GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    No different than the squeaky wheel getting the grease. It’s all a form of speech. The rich guy, or group of people incorporate, have as much right to attempt to influence their elected representatives as anyone else.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    jbmlaw01  almost 4 years ago

    Leftists believe the first amendment allows congress to constrict freedom of speech – reading difficulty I suppose. There is an intelligent alternative – vote against people who support stupid intrusions on your freedom.

     •  Reply
  40. Hikingrest
    Saddenedby GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    this strip is like going to a impressionistic modern day art gallery. everybody sees what they want to see and interprets it the way they wish. so this makes an excellent strip for people to ‘discuss’. however my winged unicorn is calling and i’ve had too many gumdrops so i am off to purchase a law that i can call my own and make everybody else bow down and obey that law – because it is all about the power – not the law – UP UP and AWAY! just keep electing them and others will keep buying them and we will all be flying unicorns and eating gumdrops in a far off land of Utopia!!!

     •  Reply
  41. Missing large
    adamsdc  almost 4 years ago

    Money and politics go hand in hand. The campaign laws limiting money also limit speech. The Supremes have decided that unions and corporations have equal rights to speech, and thus contributions, to any cause their shareholders or union members support. Does this buy influence? You bet. Just look at the rulings from the leftists who control the NLRB and NMB appointed by Obama after they contributed billions to elect him. I’m glad Pastis has shown this to be the truth in this strip, although it should be noticed that he talks about “billionaires” which would include the unions who have spent billions to elect their candidates.

     •  Reply
  42. Missing large
    Joy Sabl GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Union leadership is elected, and union positions are also put to a vote of the membership—as is whether or not to donate to candidates, vs focusing on public education, issues activism, etc. Thus it’s hard to argue that union contributions are exactly equivalent to the donation of a single multimillionaire (even if the size of the donations may be comparable).

     •  Reply
  43. Turn in your weapons   it worked for the indians
    trm  almost 4 years ago

    Thereby proving once again that inside every leftist is a totalitarian screaming to get out.

     •  Reply
  44. Missing large
    Carl Rennhack GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Rat as a Congressman proves that, if PRO is the opposite of CON, the opposite of PROgress just has to be…

     •  Reply
  45. Missing large
    adamsdc  almost 4 years ago

    I suspect the reason there are no bankers in jail is that they give far more money to the Dems than the Pubs. Can’t get any money from your sponsor when he’s in the clink. But money buys votes, even if the money comes from unions whose members may be forced to join to keep a job, or a leftist billionaire who made his money polluting the climate like Steyer. http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/the-boys-of-summer-july-s-biggest-super-pac-donors-20140822

     •  Reply
  46. 2541 6924938
    mjb515  almost 4 years ago

    Obviously, the SCOTUS decision flies in the face of that great principle of American jurisprudence “guilty until proven innocent”.

    Due to the obvious baleful influence of cartoonists over politics much greater than the “Joe Nobodys” of this great nation, Cartoon Syndicates are limited to spending $250 per week in total to produce a single comic strip title. After all, “money is not speech”.

     •  Reply
  47. Dr horrible pinkraygun
    cupertino jay  almost 4 years ago

    too long dint read. um, too many comments to read neither.

     •  Reply
  48. Nina mckinney 2
    barister  almost 4 years ago

    Let them eat cake.

     •  Reply
  49. Duck958
    Brass Orchid GC Insider almost 4 years ago

    Specifically, corporations are representative of people.So are Unions, Advocacy Groups, Special interests of all stripes, and the stray Citizens Grass Roots Collective. But why do people hate collectives so much if they feel that we need one Collective to Rule Them All?If that is the Imp of the Perverse, does that make Joe Carroll from The Following a caricature of Joe Biden?

     •  Reply
  50. Sad
    claire de la lune.  almost 4 years ago

    This is the second political strip this month.

     •  Reply
  51. Sad
    claire de la lune.  almost 4 years ago

    However, once I get this, this will probably be the best strip of the month.

     •  Reply
  52. N1495118875 241922 2408
    Ermine Notyours  4 months ago

    Rat used to be a congressman? I guess he has more political experience than the current real-world president.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Pearls Before Swine

Advertisement
Advertisement