My admiration for Oliphant as an editorial cartoonist and artist increases with every submission. However, Rush in drag…my eyes!Plus, now this image is in my head, the horror!
His ability to capture the blowhard and portray him in all his idiocy is priceless. His Cheney, Lil’ Bushie, Rummy and the rest are perfect.
The man is a treasure!
While I’ve never been Specter’s biggest fan, I admire the honesty in which he made the switch – citing political expediency, as well as the fact that the Republican party has (my words) lost its way. It’s an important (but often ignored) lesson: Attempting to simultaneously appeal to stump-ignorant, race-bating, slack-jawed, knuckle-dragging, religious fetishists – as well as to cynical corporatist mysanthropes and self-loathing, sexually-closeted, white suburbanites will result in only temporary success. Eventually, the bile will reflux and cause purgation. The flaming package of lies that landed on America’s doorstep with the glazed-eyes Reaganites has slowly ruptured and is now seaping an ungodly stink. And all that Republicans can do in response is to nervously offer up more putrid stink; and they don’t even bother repackaging it! Astounding.
One more thing about Barry Goldwate – he would have been appalled by the Rovian tactics that are now the mainstay of Republican political campaigns.
During the 1964 Presidentical campaign, one of LBJ’s top aides was busted by the cops while in a compromising position with another guy. And I mean in the act, not just in a ‘wide stance’ ala Larry Craig.
Ignoring the pleas of his campaign staff, Senator Goldwater refused to make political hay out of this incident…and this was AFTER the Johnson camp aired the infamous, ‘Daisy Girl’ tv ad.
Contrast THAT with the campaign tactics of the man who now occupies his old Senate Seat, “Obama wants to teach sex to five-year-olds!”
Good post, dred. I like Heinlein’s formulation, which is much-loved by libertarians, that a “rational anarchist” believes there is no such thing as a State – only men. (And presumably women - this was in 1966.) Trouble is, anarchy, however rational, isn’t really a viable form for large-scale, interdependent, technological civilizations. At least it doesn’t seem likely to be, since it means pretty much “every man for himself.” Seems to me they are making assumptions about the inherent goodness of humanity that would make William Jennings Bryan blanch.
By the way, “anarchy” doesn’t mean “every man for himself”, at least with the usual connotation; it simply means “without rulers.” The three sub-definitions under the first division of Webster’s definition are (a) absence of government; (b) a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority; and (c) a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government. The first of these is emotionally neutral, the second is certainly undesireable, and the third is highly desireable. “Cooperative anarchy” is not a contradiction in terms, and indeed there are communities which run/have run successfully along those lines (although it is acknowledged that these work BEST when they are SMALLEST).
I’m NOT an anarchist, by the way, because I believe that government is the best way to protect the individual, not from the excesses of too much government, but from the excesses of those INDIVIDUALS who would victimize other INDIVIDUALS if given a free hand. Those who oppose “government interference” in “free enterprise” are the REAL anarchists we need to be wary of. They are FAR more dangerous than some unkempt black-flag-waver, and they are the ones who espouse a philosophy of “every man for himself” (sometimes phrased as “Take whatever you can grab”).
Dtroutma almost 15 years ago
Is that Rush in drag??
MaryWorth Premium Member almost 15 years ago
LLeRay, is there an echo here?
believecommonsense almost 15 years ago
Sublimely drawn portrait of Rush. I notice the penguin isn’t saying anything. “Call when the stench is gone.”
ernie almost 15 years ago
My admiration for Oliphant as an editorial cartoonist and artist increases with every submission. However, Rush in drag…my eyes!Plus, now this image is in my head, the horror! His ability to capture the blowhard and portray him in all his idiocy is priceless. His Cheney, Lil’ Bushie, Rummy and the rest are perfect. The man is a treasure!
MaryWorth Premium Member almost 15 years ago
I guess Rush ain’t gonna use the term “grab your ankles” any time soon…
CorosiveFrog Premium Member almost 15 years ago
Can somebody give that guy a bra?
dwyant almost 15 years ago
Wait until he get a load of the new residence!
Casserole almost 15 years ago
While I’ve never been Specter’s biggest fan, I admire the honesty in which he made the switch – citing political expediency, as well as the fact that the Republican party has (my words) lost its way. It’s an important (but often ignored) lesson: Attempting to simultaneously appeal to stump-ignorant, race-bating, slack-jawed, knuckle-dragging, religious fetishists – as well as to cynical corporatist mysanthropes and self-loathing, sexually-closeted, white suburbanites will result in only temporary success. Eventually, the bile will reflux and cause purgation. The flaming package of lies that landed on America’s doorstep with the glazed-eyes Reaganites has slowly ruptured and is now seaping an ungodly stink. And all that Republicans can do in response is to nervously offer up more putrid stink; and they don’t even bother repackaging it! Astounding.
charliekane almost 15 years ago
Pat is the Mozart of his profession.
BTW Cass,next time tell us what you really think if the ‘pugs!
Herbabee almost 15 years ago
^ Yah. The teabag is strong in this one.
(yikes, skip up one from Charlie - you interloper you!)
believecommonsense almost 15 years ago
Howie, it may no longer be possible to remove the stench surrounding Limblah, it’s apparently intrinsic to his being
Lt_Lanier almost 15 years ago
Arlen pulled a ‘Jeffords’…sigh, where have the Goldwaters and Scoop Jacksons gone?
Lt_Lanier almost 15 years ago
He left because that’s all he was in the Republican party…a Spectre.
Lt_Lanier almost 15 years ago
…little ghost.
deadheadzan almost 15 years ago
This toon is a treasure. Every detail tells the story. Rush in drag and Specter and penguin walking out in silence says it all.
riley05 almost 15 years ago
Baseed on his posts, I actually feel sorry for Stewie, living his angry, pathetic, marginalized existence.
Simon_Jester almost 15 years ago
One more thing about Barry Goldwate – he would have been appalled by the Rovian tactics that are now the mainstay of Republican political campaigns.
During the 1964 Presidentical campaign, one of LBJ’s top aides was busted by the cops while in a compromising position with another guy. And I mean in the act, not just in a ‘wide stance’ ala Larry Craig.
Ignoring the pleas of his campaign staff, Senator Goldwater refused to make political hay out of this incident…and this was AFTER the Johnson camp aired the infamous, ‘Daisy Girl’ tv ad.
Contrast THAT with the campaign tactics of the man who now occupies his old Senate Seat, “Obama wants to teach sex to five-year-olds!”
deadheadzan almost 15 years ago
By today’s standards Goldwater was liberal on many social issues.
Simon_Jester almost 15 years ago
Not so much a liberal as a libertarian.
Motivemagus almost 15 years ago
Good post, dred. I like Heinlein’s formulation, which is much-loved by libertarians, that a “rational anarchist” believes there is no such thing as a State – only men. (And presumably women - this was in 1966.) Trouble is, anarchy, however rational, isn’t really a viable form for large-scale, interdependent, technological civilizations. At least it doesn’t seem likely to be, since it means pretty much “every man for himself.” Seems to me they are making assumptions about the inherent goodness of humanity that would make William Jennings Bryan blanch.
fritzoid Premium Member almost 15 years ago
By the way, “anarchy” doesn’t mean “every man for himself”, at least with the usual connotation; it simply means “without rulers.” The three sub-definitions under the first division of Webster’s definition are (a) absence of government; (b) a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority; and (c) a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom without government. The first of these is emotionally neutral, the second is certainly undesireable, and the third is highly desireable. “Cooperative anarchy” is not a contradiction in terms, and indeed there are communities which run/have run successfully along those lines (although it is acknowledged that these work BEST when they are SMALLEST).
I’m NOT an anarchist, by the way, because I believe that government is the best way to protect the individual, not from the excesses of too much government, but from the excesses of those INDIVIDUALS who would victimize other INDIVIDUALS if given a free hand. Those who oppose “government interference” in “free enterprise” are the REAL anarchists we need to be wary of. They are FAR more dangerous than some unkempt black-flag-waver, and they are the ones who espouse a philosophy of “every man for himself” (sometimes phrased as “Take whatever you can grab”).
Lt_Lanier almost 15 years ago
He’s been pushed to the rear of the Seniority line by Reid and Co. Senility will happen before his Seniority.
macb423 almost 15 years ago
Why on earth would ANYONE listen to Limbaugh for years? I listed once, in 1993. I got the point. I didn’t need to listen again. Saved a lot of time.
Colbert almost 15 years ago
dirty house
lindz.coop Premium Member almost 15 years ago
Somebody just hit the flush button – that gets rid of the stench at our house.