Over the Hedge by T Lewis and Michael Fry for June 05, 2021

  1. Missing large
    Doug K  over 2 years ago

    Aw. I wanted to hear his explanation.

     •  Reply
  2. Picture
    Breadboard  over 2 years ago

    RJ when is a bush a clean restroom ?

     •  Reply
  3. Image
    Hydrohead  over 2 years ago

    If there is no BUC-EE’s on the way, how are you going to stock up on jerky and trail mix?

     •  Reply
  4. Ellis archer profile
    Ellis97  over 2 years ago

    How are they gonna get there anyways?

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    gokar RLV  over 2 years ago

    Interstellar travel is not impossible it just takes a really long time with today’s technology. The 2 Voyager craft prove it can be done.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    b.john71  over 2 years ago

    Twinkies will survive interstellar travel with a half-life of forever

     •  Reply
  7. 2541 6924938
    mjb515  over 2 years ago

    Don’t think too hard about the water reclamation necessary for such a trip.

     •  Reply
  8. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member over 2 years ago

    I believe that we are finally getting the first BUC-EE’s in Kentucky soon…

     •  Reply
  9. Thumbnail img 0108
    Jeffin Premium Member over 2 years ago

    I bet it would be a squirelly explanation anyway Vern.

     •  Reply
  10. 2006 afl collingwood
    nosirrom  over 2 years ago

    Not being familiar with BUC-EE’s I looked it up and when I clicked on the link to buc-ees.com my internet security program blocked the connection saying that it was infected with malware Script:SNH-gen [Trj]. Makes me wonder what I could be infected with if I visited one of their locations.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    swenbu Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Love Hammy’s interstellar space gloves! They go with the helmets, I guess.

     •  Reply
  12. Oz yells
    bryan42  over 2 years ago

    If Hammie is involved then there is nothing that is impossible. Just let him be Captain and the universe knows no limits.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    xtc45688  over 2 years ago

    Or Twinkies.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    xtc45688  over 2 years ago

    Or Twinkies.

     •  Reply
  15. Triscele
    txmystic  over 2 years ago

    OK Texans, lightning poll—BUC-EE’s or Love’s?

    (note: your answer will tell me whether or not you frequent west Texas!)

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    epaphus8  over 2 years ago

    But for humans, all of outer space is their restroom.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    alf4evr  over 2 years ago

    BUC-EEs is a must!

     •  Reply
  18. Screenshot 2023 09 14 at 11.21.54 am
    KEA  over 2 years ago

    So… the Hedge is in the South? (I had to look up Buc-ees

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    dj95054 Premium Member over 2 years ago

    I thought that all of the comments would be about our Sun being the nearest star. Silly me.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    briangj2  over 2 years ago

    Proxima Centauri, also known as Alpha Centauri C, is the closest star to Earth. It is located in the constellation Centaurus.

    The star lies at a distance of only 4.243 light years from Earth. The name Proxima means “next to” or “nearest to” in Latin. Proxima’s distance to the second and third closest stars to the Sun, Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B, is 0.237 ± 0.011 light years.

    Proxima Centauri is very likely the third component of the Alpha Centauri system, but the star’s orbital period may be more than 500,000 years.

    Proxima Centauri is a red dwarf, too faint to be seen with the naked eye. It has an apparent magnitude of 11.05. It was discovered by the Scottish astronomer Robert Innes in 1915.

    The star is classified as a flare star, which means that it is a variable star that randomly undergoes sudden increases in brightness as a result of magnetic activity. The star’s flare activity produces X-ray emission similar to the Sun’s.

    Proxima Centauri has a mass only about an eighth of the Sun’s and a diameter a seventh that of the Sun.

    The star produces energy at a relatively low rate and will likely stay on the main sequence for another four trillion years, which is about 300 times the age of the universe (13.8 billion years).


     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Over the Hedge