Nancy by Olivia Jaimes for April 11, 2018


Hide All Comments
  1. Jcimg
    juncarlo  almost 3 years ago

    Why do I miss the another Nancy? Well, I give her a chance to the new.

     •  Reply
  2. Major matt mason315
    Major Matt Mason Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Nancy Goes Milliennial. :P

     •  Reply
  3. 20171209 162903
    Rosette  almost 3 years ago

    “Good ol’ Nancy”

     •  Reply
  4. Tracy
    coratelli  almost 3 years ago

    I hope to see Phil and Fritzi soon.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    kconnell  almost 3 years ago

    So far one of three strips have been funny. Trying to give it a chance. Hope it improves quickly.

     •  Reply
  6. Kat 1
    katina.cooper  almost 3 years ago

    What she doesn’t realize is that a lot of the other kids don’t have aunt Fritzi and Phil to look after them.

     •  Reply
  7. Dr g 01 2020
    sheilag  almost 3 years ago

    It’s getting a little weird – with these off-to-the-side commenters. If the artist is picking up the Nancy strip, then can we pick it up a little, instead of the asides and comments about the main character?

    Or, is a re-boot in progress and this is now some avant-garde, trippy strip a la “Zippy the Pinhead”?

     •  Reply
  8. Rankin badge   tartan 2
    jrankin1959  almost 3 years ago

    After 80+ years, Nancy lets her true feelings out?

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    HSue917  almost 3 years ago

    hate the “new” Nancy!

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Uncle Bob  almost 3 years ago

    Recall last week’s arc. Look at this week’s strips. The sense of community has been replaced by one of isolation. Even if there are two characters together, they are “wired”; in essence still alone. If this is millennial humor, I’m glad I’m a boomer. Bum knees and all…

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    FLW  almost 3 years ago

    There is definitely a new Nancy in town. The saccharine story lines and over-rendered panels are gone and the daily gags in a simple drawing style are back—just like Ernie did.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    pkwilfong  almost 3 years ago

    Sorry if this is the Nancy of the future I’m outta here.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    BJB  almost 3 years ago

    Think each day they are worst than the day before… bring the Nancy we love back!

     •  Reply
  14. 49ba3867 632b 4ec8 bf6e d7fcafaf3103
    johntaylor  almost 3 years ago

    I like it so far. The previous Nancy was so sweet it made my teeth hurt.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    h.v.greenman  almost 3 years ago

    Someone remind me to check back in 6 months or so to see if this strip has decided to get funny. In the mean time I am out of here

     •  Reply
  16. Mid9
    Leslie B.  almost 3 years ago

    Look! A new floaty head! This one got used as a hood ornament on an old Buick V8 roadster with blue pinstripes. Or did someone decapitate it and place it on the precarious edge of a tall beanbag in the foreground? Exciting. Props for the slightly darker hand in the second panel: a gentle nod to the claymation of Rankin-Bass from the mid-60s.

     •  Reply
  17. Mike   chris
    Jan C  almost 3 years ago

    The talking heads add a new dimension to the strip. They provide narration and a set-up for the punch line.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    JimmiComics Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    New artist! I loved Guy’s stuff. But looking forward to the new perspective. Olivia – good start!

     •  Reply
  19. 1939 11 adventure neff
    Donaldo Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    ok, three strips and three strangers commenting on Nancy. This is getting a bit weird

     •  Reply
  20. Kw eyecon 20190702 091103 r
    Kip W  almost 3 years ago

    How is the floating head able to tell Nancy is thinking of others, and yet unable to discern the exact nature of her thoughts? A nearsighted mindreader?

     •  Reply
  21. Menew
    Thomas Scott Roberts creator almost 3 years ago

    A changeover with no continuity from the previous version is always jarring. I tried to explore that idea when I did a fake “History of Working Daze” back around 2012. John took a few Sundays off, while I explored the question: “What if this strip had been running for a hundred years, with abrupt changes in style as new creators took over and took it different ways?” I wrote and drew it in a series of contrasting styles that probably would have had readers up in arms if they had actually happened.

    The change here in NANCY gives us a real world chance to answer the question. Readers are divided already. Guy’s a friend and a good guy, but I want to see where this is going.

     •  Reply
  22. Missing large
    GoComics Moderator  almost 3 years ago

    I’ve read ahead a few weeks. Privilege of being a moderator. ;)

    Give it some time. I think a lot of people are going to like it.

     •  Reply
  23. Picture
    JudyHendrickson  almost 3 years ago

    yeahnancy everyone wants to becool

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    lambert2015  almost 3 years ago

    Three days now with new “Nancy” and the artist is starting to lose me already.

     •  Reply
  25. Picture
    JudyHendrickson  almost 3 years ago

    what happenedto guy gil crest

     •  Reply
  26. Oscar wilde
    maybeinthenextworld  almost 3 years ago

    Olivia, you are a god-send!

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    lambert2015  almost 3 years ago

    Bring back “Nancy” reruns from the start. Those would be better than the new strip started this week.

     •  Reply
  28. 20200405 170614
    Catmom  almost 3 years ago

    Doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere. Colors are drab, and the “plot” so far is pretty lame. Try the Nancy Classics, they are dated but still funny.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    cpietran Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    This is a horribly ugly strip and a seriously deranged way of doing it. Should have let it END with the finale to Gilchrist’s term. YUCK! If what I read is true, the artist/writer is not even using a real name! (out of shame?) Can anyone confirm that?

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    shirley_smith53  almost 3 years ago

    Do NOT like the new Nancy!

     •  Reply
  31. Sluggofloating
    James Dawson  almost 3 years ago

    I like the weird humor and the Bushmiller-esque art of the new “Nancy.” It’s the first strip I read every day now!

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    Malcolm Hall  almost 3 years ago

    The format of the disembodied head commenting on Nancy with the surprised reveal is getting tiresome. For example, today’s could start with Nancy’s thought balloon: " I should be thinking of other people instead of myself." The follow-up panel could be the same. The trouble with the present format is that there’s no reason for the woman in the left hand panel to assume that Nancy is thinking about other people. The artist’s style reminds me of Tom Fonder who draws Business Cat, which is becoming somewhat demented.

     •  Reply
  33. Steam powered giraffe spg1 small
    Liza Saint  almost 3 years ago

    I’ll give it a week, week and a half at most, to see if this new Nancy will grow on me. So far I am not impressed. I am finding no humor in it, nor are there any moral-centric plots. I liked that about Gilchrist’s Nancy. Right now I am finding it trite and boring.

     •  Reply
  34. Sluggofloating
    James Dawson  almost 3 years ago

    The new Nancy has the sensibility of the “Angry Little Girls” strip (which I also like). Definitely a departure from every other version of the strip.

     •  Reply
  35. Avatar
    Edwin Hardy Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    I understand the controversy. The previous version of Nancy favored nostalgia over everything else. Olivia’s version is a modern take on the character. The two appeal to completely different groups. I, for example, didn’t read the old version because it seemed too saccharine. I only added Nancy back to my list of comics when Olivia took over because it’s much more to my taste. Keep it up, Olivia.

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    William Sutton Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Dropping this version of ‘Nancy’ today. I don’t see the potential in this version and I will just check back now and then. Too drab and unfunny!!

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    Today’s “Nancy” is actually much more in line with the Bushmiller strips. Back to the basics? I like it.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    ericbrower  almost 3 years ago

    And now I have my outstanding criticism of Ms. Jaimes’ rendition of Nancy. All previous incarnations showed a sweet little girl with a slightly a skewed vision of the world around her. This Nancy feels dry, cynical, with the emotional range of cardboard. She is this generation’s ‘Daria’. Oh my god, that’s it. After over 50 years, Olivia Jaimes has decided to finally age Nancy into a (shudder) pre-teen girl.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    tracybsmith  almost 3 years ago

    I understand art evolves, grows, and changes. I also know art is very subjective. However, with that being said, so far I find myself not enjoying this ‘new’ Nancy. I do miss Gilchrist’s “Nancy”. I loved the colors and the sweetness in today’s not-so-sweet world. (yes, I have reached that age). I do like snarky humor but I also find it sad that this is what this strip has been reduced to. Best of luck to the new artist though.

     •  Reply
  40. Photo
    VVVVW  almost 3 years ago

    You must be reading her mind.

     •  Reply
  41. 21080 1600x1200 wallpaper cb1318527290
    Yes, Very Good  almost 3 years ago

    So far, I’m digging it! It seems fairly obvious to me that the new author is using these anonymous observers to help establish the tone and context of this version of the Nancy universe. What we’ve seen so far is very much in line with Bushmiller’s Nancy, who was driven by greed and envy just as much as she was driven by compassion or friendship — if not moreso. But it also feels true to Jaimes’ own unique sensibilities.

     •  Reply
  42. Professor chaos
    countoftowergrove  almost 3 years ago

    These floating heads don’t look like they should be in the Nancyverse.

     •  Reply
  43. Missing large
    EOCostello  almost 3 years ago

    I’m not sure it was a good idea to run three strips right in a row where a person is commenting on Nancy. Makes it seem like the same joke. Hopefully, we’ll get some different takes to mix it up.

     •  Reply
  44. Missing large
    Dsfrye5696  almost 3 years ago

    Don’t like this version of Nancy, what happened to Guy Gilchrist’s version ? I liked the original version better.

     •  Reply
  45. 0146yellow
    Vilyehm  almost 3 years ago

    In trying to create a color style of its own, somebody has declared that it be nothing more than continual variations of three week old pea soup.

    I cannot get past the Cyrano typecast noses. Bushmiller was a minimalist, but when a gun was drawn it looked like a gun. And a drawn character may have looked funny, but realistically funny.

    Every line shown looks too exact. A result of computer generation?


    Colorist error to Nancy’s right hand in second panel?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Nancy