A billion and a half Muslims, about the same ratio of scum as with “Christians” who want peace, like the broad.
As analogies go, this one just about makes it thru’ to anal…
Gee, a reasonably dumb toon, no surprise.
Saying no to someone on the train sipping your tea is not racist. Not allowing someone on the train is racist. Not sitting next to someone because of their religion is being a bigot. Not liking someone because they are Muslim is not racist, but it is bigoted. Sharing your tea with everyone except the Muslims is bigoted. So if Uncle Sam was sharing his tea with everyone, then said no to the Muslims, that would be bigoted. If he let the non-sick Muslim have some, but the sick one (the radical one) didn’t get any, that is just being careful. If you don’t understand the difference between any of this, enjoy your basket.
By throwing stones aren’t you contradicting the example of Jesus Christ? By judging are you confirming the example of Jesus?
McVeigh requested and received Catholic last rights, Auschwitz was run by “good Christians”(HItler was also raised Roman Catholic), and in both cases the “media” didn’t say much about that. Complicity of silence when it makes “your side” look bad is a human trait, yes, but American nationalism, as in “Make America Great Again” or “American exceptionalism” is today as deadly when practiced by our media, or politicians.
narrowmindedIgnoring the Qur’an again! “People of the Book” (Jews and Christians) are not to be harmed. Muslims pay 2.5% of all they own, through their mosque, to assist the poor. People of the Book pay taxes to support the government. Harm them and there will be no funds to pay for the usual governmental functions. So you better let them prosper.
your “factual” statements are actually religious bigotry. Their religion of peace is wrong, my religion of peace is right. I do disagree that Jesus died for conversions and Mohammed killed for conversions.
“Radical Islam” is sneezing in hand – the correct way to sneeze is into the inside of your elbow.If “Islam” is asking for a drink of tea, is that the “Tea Party”?US is shown as being very small, so Lester must not think much of the US.As far as the media’s treatment of Trump, I find it amazing that he can say things without being questioned about the opposite POV previously expressed.
Don’t forget the one about how, if you don’t suspect and browbeat every Muslim man, woman, and child, you’re “putting mints on the terrorists’ pillows.” That one always fires up the base.
Also, Islam doesn’t cover for “Radical Islam.” You’re thinking of that US gang that likes to wear blue and rides around in cars, stopping people.
A well done cartoon.It got across the point that some of the gift would aid an enemy.It would have done better if it were possible to show some who were enemies and some who were not enemies would like the gift at the same time, take one take all, reject any reject all..Most of us would like to help the helpless even though we don’t really want to hurt our loved ones in the process.
Oh Mike…you’re just so confused. Please take a vaca until after Hillary is elected president. You need it.