Michael Ramirez for September 23, 2020

  1. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  over 1 year ago

    If you REALLY think this is fair, then you really don’t think. I think.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    Daeder  over 1 year ago

    Pay no attention to that sucking sound. It’s only Mikey, “the black hole”, Ramirez.

     •  Reply
  3. Tf 117
    RAGs  over 1 year ago

    Rambo-mirez doesn’t want anyone to see that the republicans are psychopathic sycophant’s. He wants to cover up the fact that Trump has expanded the ban on government agencies having their employees attend racial and sexual sensitivity training. Now his banning government contractors from having that training also.

     •  Reply
  4. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass Premium Member over 1 year ago

    It is only okay if the republicans play dirty. Democrats must always play on the up and up. Do as I say, not as I do, the republican mantra. Democrats get down and dirty like the Republicans and the Republicans whine like a female dog.

     •  Reply
  5. Paul f rst  der doctor schnabel von rom  coloured version
    @Rad-ish  Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Still waiting for Nancy to do something besides hint.

     •  Reply
  6. Pat new 150
    Patjade Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Projection from a clown (the artist, not the cartoon).

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Pogostiks Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Here’s the problem: McConnell invented a reason to block Obama – and created a precedent. Then when the Dems tell him he should continue to follow his own precedent, he refuses. Hypocritically. When McConnell smugly refused to even meet or interview Obama’s pick, he was in fact not even doing his job as a Senator. He was in fact creating a way around Constitutional protocol. That Pelosi might now try to block McConnell’s cynical ploys by impeachment is NOT on an equivalent level of cynicism. Why not? Because she would be using existing possible protocols rather than inventing new ones. McConnell could have blocked Obama’s candidate simply by following the protocols – having interviews with the candidate and then voting against him – but he chose to show his entire disdain for anything approaching rule of law or protocol that he he went outside the norms only because he could. Well, that Pelosi blocks him with existing protocols (impeachment) only because she can is simply poetic justice. If McConnel had followed the protocols instead of raising his middle finger to Obama – the Dems wouldn’t be fighting him now. They’d grumble, but would accept his right to do so. If anyone is to blame here for the present situation, it is the Republicans. Don’t forget that in Bush/Gore – they actually stopped the recount to make sure that Bush would be president – rather than let the re-count play out normally. They rig voting lists, they close down voting stations unnecessarily, and they have hindered the Postal Service – all as attempts to rig the elections. They have never played fair – so why should the Dems?

     •  Reply
  8. 1faentz
    OldCoal  over 1 year ago

    It’s stupid. It’s a Ramirez.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    walfishj  over 1 year ago

    Isn’t that Kavanaugh?

     •  Reply
  10. Idiocracy  1
    Dave Ferro  over 1 year ago

    Good one, Michael! :-)

     •  Reply
  11. Covid
    Librarylady  over 1 year ago

    The stink of fear is swirling around all the conservative “comics”. So used to Dems playing fair as compared to their corruption and hypocrisy, scares the bejesus out of them when we let them know we’re fed up with their behavior.

     •  Reply
  12. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Moscow Mitch has turned the Senate into a circus.. so if Nancy can add an act or two I say go for it.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    thomaspryan  over 1 year ago

    Nice hair.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    preacherman  over 1 year ago

    The Repubs taught us well.

     •  Reply
  15. Jax 1
    ms-ss  over 1 year ago

    This is funny!

     •  Reply
  16. Photo
    Bleeds RED (sox, too)  over 1 year ago

    She’s CUTTING edge !

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    ferddo  over 1 year ago

    Your jealousy is showing, Mikey. If your leader was truly a stable genius he would have thought of these things himself… and you’d be cheering…

     •  Reply
  18. Paul f rst  der doctor schnabel von rom  coloured version
    @Rad-ish  Premium Member over 1 year ago

    Nancy should impeach Barr.

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    The Love of Money is . . .  over 1 year ago

    I like how they have already agreed to confirm Trump’s nominee without knowing who or what it will be. Now that’s what I call a profile of courage. . . . . /s

     •  Reply
  20. Marx.
    DeepState  over 1 year ago

    Republicans like to game the system and pretend that they are just following the rules as written. The democrats can play by the same rules, as written.

     •  Reply
  21. Av
    gcottay  over 1 year ago

    Mike, did your parents not teach you about lies?

     •  Reply
  22. Photo
    VadimUzdensky1  over 1 year ago

    Abolishing the filibuster is useful and good, because nowadays it is mostly used for partisan hackery as opposed to actual debate. Packing the court might be dangerous, but ultimately depends on who is picked for those seats. By blocking Merrick Garland, Mitch McConnell has indulged in a little court-packing himself. Of course, the Republicans could also do the same thing if they retained the Senate and Presidency. They could do this now.

    Not sure where extortion came from. And impeachment is justified, even accounting for no double jeopardy.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    tauyen  over 1 year ago

    His attempt at political cartoons are so uninformed that they don’t deserve any commentary. As I did with Payne, there will be no more opening of this nonsense.

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    DrDon1  over 1 year ago

    Does Ramirez really play the ‘Jester’ in Adelson’s court?

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    pepys  over 1 year ago

    Abolish the filibuster? What filibuster?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Michael Ramirez