We can vote for someone who is old, old-fashioned, touchy-feely (though he’s working on it) and likely to choose good advisors and actually listen to them. And has been accused of one sexual assault.
Or we can vote for someone who is a con-man, a liar, an accused (several times) rapist including the rape of a 13 year old and has admitted to at least one such act. Who has clearly demonstrated his reluctnce to choose good advisors or listen to them.
Lets just be perfectly clear:
We can vote for someone who is old, old-fashioned, touchy-feely (though he’s working on it) and likely to choose good advisors and actually listen to them. And has been accused of one sexual assault.
Or we can vote for someone who is a con-man, a liar, an accused (several times) rapist including the rape of a 13 year old and has admitted to at least one such act. Who has clearly demonstrated his reluctnce to choose good advisors or listen to them.