Matt Wuerker for August 01, 2019

  1. Zombie keith
    streetbeater  about 2 years ago

    Oh, this started way before Trump. Nixon was on track to beat Kennedy in ‘60 until the TV debates, where his sweaty upper lip and five o’clock shadow doomed him against Kennedy’s suave good looks. Ever since then it’s just been one refinement after another. Let’s face it, when it comes to understanding ratings, Trump is a master and every other politician is an amateur.

     •  Reply
  2. Tumblr mbbz3vrusj1qdlmheo1 250
    Night-Gaunt49  about 2 years ago

    Just remember that Trump said and did things that should have gotten him a massive fail. Until the fix was in and despite losing by 3 million votes the Russians got him the Electoral votes he needed.

     •  Reply
  3. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member about 2 years ago

    As if the Republican Debacle in 2016 WASN’T a “Game Show”…

     •  Reply
  4. Picture
    EdMeiller Premium Member about 2 years ago

    I like and watch CNN but they were too over the top with the debates and the ads for them. It did seem circus like.

     •  Reply
  5. Pine marten3
    martens  about 2 years ago

    I don’t watch these “debates”. They are uninformative on substance and too much like a cheesy game show. You want to know how one candidate or another thinks on his/her feet, then go to the town hall-type presentations. Yes, it takes more time than the slap-dash free-for-all of these shows, but then you also get something more meaningful about the various candidates, what they think (their policy suggestions) and how they think in citizen interactions. If we aren’t willing to put in the effort to learn about these kinds of things, maybe we deserve what we get.

     •  Reply
  6. Paul f rst  der doctor schnabel von rom  coloured version
    @Rad-ish  Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Joe Friday’s famous business-like catch phrase, “Just the facts, ma’am.”

     •  Reply
  7. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  about 2 years ago

    Politics is all about getting the minds and pocketbooks of the folks who have one or the other. Pocketbooks are more important though.

     •  Reply
  8. Quill pen
    Yontrop  about 2 years ago

    I was unhappy about the Presidential election becoming a horse race. Making it a circus is not helping. It seems more and more — the skill set needed to win the election is not what we need in a President.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    wellis1947 Premium Member about 2 years ago

    Obviously, what America NEEDS is a minimum set of standards for controlling who can run for president – our current set of standards (upright & breathing) has failed to keep out the “riffraff”.

    I’ll start watching the Democratic Debates when the time-wasters are gone (a “self-help” guru? Seriously?)

    I will grant you that even Maggie would make a ‘better’ president than what we’ve got now, that’s such a low bar, it’s ridiculous.

     •  Reply
  10. Photo
    Hippogriff  about 2 years ago

    Use the parliamentary system for nominees. Card carrying members of a party convene and vote on platform and candidate. Last place candidate is dropped and they vote again. Repeat until someone gets a majority.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Wuerker