Matt Wuerker for March 28, 2012

Doesn’t that saving lives and making lives better, and healthier, defy that silly “general welfare” idea? Let’s all get on the bandwagon for the “Ryan plan ice flow”!

But all those are for the good of the country, not the good of the individual.

Is it Constitutional to make people buy clothes?What about the “Exposure” laws?

I have this image of a civilized society — a society in which people care for each other and create the institutions which can make that care effective — a society which pays attention to the world around us — a society which creates the conditions in which each individual can flourish — a society in which skills and education are taken seriously — a society in which differences are appreciated rather than used as grounds for suspicion and hatred. I guess that’s all too much to ask for.

If you don’t like the individual mandate, then come up with a universal insurance system that works. It’s not hard — just look around at the other countries that manage to do it. Does American Exceptionalism mean the US is too stupid to learn from example?

The government makes people pay taxes, right? So, what’s the problem here?

Don’t forget the giveaway to Big Pharm in the form of Part D.

You forgot:

*Take money from you in the form of TAX

It WILL be interesting to see what SCOTUS comes up with, because the ONLY feature of the Act challenged is the mandate to buy insurance from PRIVATE INSURERS, which I also agree should not be there. Instead, the law should have had “not for profit” single payer coverage for all.

THere is a missing comment that traces the "Obamacare directly to the Heritage foundation. I want to know what that link is! If you wrote that please repost or put it on fadcebook . and please tell the comics that it’s gone!

Ya think?

Pretty well says it all…We’ll get the GOP version of Pol Pot solution to social ills…but not all bad as the grave diggers will have a boon in business..

let them eat broccoli

What a nerve the government has got ? Next, they will be "making us buy automobile insurance or taking away our driver licenses " mandated by law ! ! ! Is that wrong ? Is that covered under the Commerce Clause ? ? ?