Matt Davies for May 27, 2009

  1. Green lingerie   003
    riley05  about 13 years ago

    Go for it! Oppose her nomination! You KNOW you want to!

     •  Reply
  2. 009 8a
    MaryWorth Premium Member about 13 years ago

    And editorial cartoonists worried they’d have no material during the Obama years… And next is the GOP vs the Pentagon ( stay tuned, folks ).

     •  Reply
  3. Image013
    believecommonsense  about 13 years ago

    please make sure the tree falls directly to the right …. oh please grant me my wish …

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Copperdomebodhi  almost 13 years ago

    ANandy - you are correct. This is because women, ‘negroes’, and people with Spanish surnames have their condescension detectors on. The GOP could nominate lots of people with Irish surnames - if they’re against everything I’m for, I won’t be voting for them.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    DianeKovacs  almost 13 years ago

    I will give credit where credit is due. Ronald Reagan did very well in nominating Sandra Day O’Connor. Mr. Reagan cared about QUALITY and in fact he is was quite clear that he did not care for Rumsfeld or Cheney or for Bush Sr. for that matter. I didn’t agree with Ronald Reagan’s politics but his sense of honor, ethics, and rationality did not waiver. He was not a right wing warmonger, paying lipservice to the christianists.

     •  Reply
  6. John adams1
    Motivemagus  almost 13 years ago

    Um…Diane, Reagan is perhaps the only president indicted by the World Court as a criminal, for mining Managua Harbor.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Davies