They don’t show a plate with Suspect # 2. In fact, they don’t even show him eating at a table.
Dang! I was hoping for salmonella poisoning from under-cooked chicken.
Rats, I was hoping the clear glass was white wine, white meat/chicken white wine, red meat/steak red wine. Chicken could be deboned breast.
Just because of her gender, she’s out? What a reach!
Just because someone stole the chicken (and who DOES THAT??) doesn’t mean they consumed it! You never have to ask if someone is a vegetarian – they will tell you over and over. She could have done it, and stolen the chicken to dispose of it and put the suspicion on the other two.
Inspector Danger’s comic strip world seems to have a LOT of wealthy people with murderous heirs… :-)
Anybody can kill someone if they get their hands on a gun. Besides, some women are professional body builders who could beat the tar out of any man.
I agree that it was suspect number one and she stole the chicken and tossed it. If it was such a bloody fight, why not check for blood and burses? I think the butler did it.
Bloody fight??? It looks like no one laid a glove on #2. Another intro of facts without evidence.
The murder took the chicken? Um, murderer …
I think it was the housekeeper’s son because he’s not mentioned anywhere in the strip.
Orrrr……now hear me out, it’s suspect #3 because he is eating his steak with white wine???No, its white with chicken! Good going detective, wrong suspect again!
However, suspect #3 is having WHITE wine with RED meat – a dead giveaway that he is really eating CHICKEN and not STEAK.
October 25, 2017