Advertisement

Henry Payne for March 29, 2012

12 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1. Missing large
    ARodney  almost 9 years ago

    The Volt was planned, designed, and marketed under Bush. Why do cons keep blaming Obama for it? Oh, yeah. Dumb question.

     •  Reply
  2. Bleach urahara0015
    ZydecoBear  almost 9 years ago

    Everything about this cartoon is a freaking lie. Why don’t you get your facts straight?

     •  Reply
  3. Dog avatar 2235
    grtrex2001  almost 9 years ago

    Obama has the push on for the independence from oil.Hence, that energy policy is, and will, drive gas prices up, to the point that the Volt will be the only auto option affordable to drive.Obamacare stresses going from a sickness healthcare, to a wellness healthcare. Hence the health system forceing the individual to an overly healthy diet, or the premiums would be higher. Also, forced exercise.A health system here in Ohio already stated this as part of Obamacare.

     •  Reply
  4. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    You sure are pulling overestimated numbers out of your nether regions in a truly typical partisan fashion. Please provide the basis for your “trillion dollar bailouts.”And although $527 Million was wasted on Solyndra, that’s nothing compared to the amount used to subsidize big oil companies, farmers, loggers, ranchers, Boeing, and lots of other pet projects of the republicans.

     •  Reply
  5. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    .“Just start WW3 and kill us all now.”That’s the republican philosophy.

     •  Reply
  6. Idiocracy  1
    Dave Ferro  almost 9 years ago

    Right. If Obamacare is found to be Constitutional (which it is NOT), then what’s to stop the government from mandating that we do everything in this cartoon and more? Apparently, to liberal lawmakers, we’re too stupid to take care of ourselves, but we’re “smart” enough to elect them???

     •  Reply
  7. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    The fuss about the “individual mandate” is a prime example of the hyper-partisanship of republicans, and a kind of hypocrisy that verges on insanity.The “individual mandate” was originally proposed and supported by republicans, and was used to counter the universal health care plan of Clinton. -————————————————————————————————-

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/health-care-provision-at-center-of-supreme-court-debate-was-a-republican-idea/2012/03/25/gIQAoCHocS_story_1.html-—————————————————————————————————Obama adopted it to get bi-partisan support for his plan.Now, suddenly, it’s a case of liberals and big government. What a laugh. Of course it’s unconstitutional, but it’s just another case of republican intrusion into people’s lives.

     •  Reply
  8. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    MX missile, Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan (creating the Taliban, then wars), Iraq, V-22, F-22, mortgage crisis through deregulation, credit card ripoffs, two decades of inflation and debt increases, corporate failures while CEOs walk off with “golden parachutes”, Katrina, eliminating ALL envrionmental laws, failure to collect royalties on TAXPAYER’’s oil in the Gulf and on land, yup, that “Reaganomics” and “Republican leadership” under Mitt, or Santorum, or Newt, is something we really need.

     •  Reply
  9. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    How exactly do higher fuel standards harm you? “Thirteen auto manufacturers and the United Auto Workers union are in favor of the plan,[to increase epa fuel mileage standards] including Chrysler, Hyundai and the Ford Motor Company.-——————————————————————-http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/24/BA001MTTNP.DTL-—————————————————————————-And as fuel economy increases, you actually save money over the life of your car, even though it costs more to purchase it initially.If you’re morally opposed to saving money, because of your religion or whatever, you can always just burn your cash in your fireplace.

     •  Reply
  10. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  almost 9 years ago

    Do you really believe that democrats don’t work for a living? Are you that remarkably uninformed?

     •  Reply
  11. Lew. shaved beard jul 11
    leweclectic  almost 9 years ago
    Your naught but the walking dead, a WWIII is not going to make You any deader.
     •  Reply
  12. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 9 years ago

    Apparently you can’t see the point, because you only consider your own opinions, and your own “tax dollars.”You only see the side of any issue that you want to see and ignore facts you don’t like.You are opposed to subsidies for electric cars, which is fair enough, but some people are equally opposed to subsidies for big oil and other profitable industries.My objection to subsidies is proportional to the size of the subsidy, and doesn’t depend on partisan hypocrisy.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Henry Payne

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement