Frazz by Jef Mallett for September 27, 2022

  1. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member 4 months ago

    Solving for “NO”: What’s the reverse reverse of “FFO”?

     •  Reply
  2. Green circle
    Rhonda Santis  4 months ago

    Some people are optimists, some are the opposite… and most of us solve for “maybe”… most of the time. The problem with optimism in this regard is bodily damage. The problem with pessimism is that you don’t get to experience so many things… even if some of them aren’t fine.

     •  Reply
  3. Bluedog
    Bilan  4 months ago

    Technically, Otto’s glider was no different from the parachute Louis-Sébastien Lenormand invented in 1783.

     •  Reply
  4. Charlesq
    Chalres  4 months ago

    ♫ I’d fly over rooftops, The great boulevards ♫

     •  Reply
  5. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  4 months ago

    The attraction of abstraction.

     •  Reply
  6. Strega
    P51Strega  4 months ago

    “gliding”, often referred to as “soaring” is a way of flying by finding air currents and updrafts. “Gliders” have made trips the length of the Appalachian mountain chain by riding the updrafts. “Gliders” have soared 10,000 feet above their release points on thermals out in the desert. While I’m a fan of powered flight, don’t sell the sailplanes short.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    goboboyd  4 months ago

    Both have downward paths. Trading altitude for air speed; Practically and intellectually. We can still enjoy the ride, but it’s nice to have a landing plan.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Tallguy  4 months ago

    On the one hand, it killed Otto.

    On the other:“Of all the men who attacked the flying problem in the 19th century, Otto Lilienthal was easily the most important. … It is true that attempts at gliding had been made hundreds of years before him, and that in the nineteenth century, Cayley, Spencer, Wenham, Mouillard, and many others were reported to have made feeble attempts to glide, but their failures were so complete that nothing of value resulted.”— Wilbur Wright

     •  Reply
  9. Boston
    MS72  4 months ago

    0=1

     •  Reply
  10. White tiger swimming
    cabalonrye  4 months ago

    Help, I don’t understand what Frazz means. What does: who solves for ‘no’ means?

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    gaderian  4 months ago

    Lillienthal’s data was all wrong. The Wright Brothers had to build a wind tunnel and get good data before building their Flyer.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    dputhoff62  4 months ago

    Gad, this talk about gliding has given me a “50 Shades of Grey” vibe.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    homfencing  4 months ago

    Given how Lilienthal died…..maybe wait until after the Wrights??

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    emanning  4 months ago

    I love that “solving for no” perspective!

     •  Reply
  15. 50859545 458d 4234 b787 53b1a2ca9ee2
    Faby  4 months ago

    Little help please! What is solving for no?

     •  Reply
  16. Yahoo avatar
    zodismoon  4 months ago

    I always wanted to fly like Superman!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Frazz