Wasn’t some bright young man out here on Saturday, pointing out how odd it was that Frazz was telling this kid what a sweetheart he is? And that it was strange to see that for some reason the kid had suddenly developed a conscience?
And didn’t he further point out that Caulfield’s messing with people is shown as deliberate, for sport? And that it was an obvious cause of another’s distress?
I don’t know who’s more strange: Mallett or the intransigent zealots who can’t admit there may be something just a little bit objectionable in his material.
July 31, 2013