I have wondered all these years if OJs high priced lawyers knew that he was guilty. Aren’t all lawyers officers of the court? That being true, and I do understand the adversarial idea of prosecutor v defense lawyer, if the lawyer knows beyond any shadow of doubt that his client is guilty of murder, and he gets him off, what responsibility does that lawyer have for society if he gets a murderer off? Law v justice. since only the rich can afford lots of high priced lawyers, doesn’t that mean we have 2 separate systems of laws? 1 for the 1% the other for the rest of us.