And the Romney outsourced American jobs oberseas... and hid his profits in offshore accounts... and then he retroactively retired from bain- ooooooooooooo!
While Mitt and Bain, DID do their best, a lot of actual companies that actually PRODUCE SOMETHING, were the “real” outsourcers who cost us the jobs. Mitt and the boys just sat back and pushed paper, a lot of bad paper, to make their money.
If you are not a millionaire, you want to keep social security. If you aren’t a millionaire, why would you want the tax rate on the rich lowered more from about14% to ? and kept permanent? While the rest of us are a tax rate of around 45%?
If you are in a job you are overqualified for why would you want a man who fired thousands and broke smaller corporations, as president?
If you are not wealthy, why would you want to have ? corporations considered to be people (my friend) SO that the big corporations CEO’s can buy the president and congress you want?IF you have no insurance wqhy wouldn’t you like a cheaper, better plan that also cuts costs to the government?And why do you believe the lies that this is a huge tax increase, when it will only effect 2% of the public? THe premiums ware on a sliding scale and lower than what you are probably paying now? And the tax payers have been paying the cost of all the uninsured people’s hospital bills when they go to the emergency room, which can’t turn anyone away. That is why the GOP introduced that mandate in the 1st place. (they were tired of paying “those lazy bum’s” bills)DO we really WANT a theocracy, a corporatocracy?I can’t spell good, sorry.
I wanted and still want Rick Perry®. Texas has by far a better economy and employment rate than most states. I can not believe how Perry was passed over for Mitt. the GOP drops the ball on this one.
A. Because there is still so much uncertainty about upcoming regulations and the costs that will be imposed. B. Other costs are still to be calculated (the cost of Obamacare for one)C. In case you haven’t noticed the tax rates have been temporary. When Bush enacted them, they were set for many years. So there was certainty and business could plan. The taxes have only been on a hike hiatus with that expected to end in December.
If Willard released his tax returns, it would clear up when he really retired, or didn’t. Of course it would cost him the election for sure — and maybe criminal liability.-It is obivous that Willard is not proud of Bain’s record — otherwise, no one would care about precisely when he retired from Bain.-I maintain that Willard will drop out of the election sooner than release those returns.
Heavy B over 11 years ago
And how will romney fix that? OH yeah, he’ll cut taxes. We all know how well THAT works.
joe vignone over 11 years ago
If that vulture capitalist gets in that monster will be 18% un-employment.
wolfhoundblues1 over 11 years ago
It is already in excess of 16% if you include all that are unemployed. It is almost 24% amongst the african-americans.
Dtroutma over 11 years ago
While Mitt and Bain, DID do their best, a lot of actual companies that actually PRODUCE SOMETHING, were the “real” outsourcers who cost us the jobs. Mitt and the boys just sat back and pushed paper, a lot of bad paper, to make their money.
pam Miner over 11 years ago
If you are not a millionaire, you want to keep social security. If you aren’t a millionaire, why would you want the tax rate on the rich lowered more from about14% to ? and kept permanent? While the rest of us are a tax rate of around 45%?
If you are in a job you are overqualified for why would you want a man who fired thousands and broke smaller corporations, as president?
If you are not wealthy, why would you want to have ? corporations considered to be people (my friend) SO that the big corporations CEO’s can buy the president and congress you want?IF you have no insurance wqhy wouldn’t you like a cheaper, better plan that also cuts costs to the government?And why do you believe the lies that this is a huge tax increase, when it will only effect 2% of the public? THe premiums ware on a sliding scale and lower than what you are probably paying now? And the tax payers have been paying the cost of all the uninsured people’s hospital bills when they go to the emergency room, which can’t turn anyone away. That is why the GOP introduced that mandate in the 1st place. (they were tired of paying “those lazy bum’s” bills)DO we really WANT a theocracy, a corporatocracy?I can’t spell good, sorry.
glenbeck over 11 years ago
I wanted and still want Rick Perry®. Texas has by far a better economy and employment rate than most states. I can not believe how Perry was passed over for Mitt. the GOP drops the ball on this one.
Heavy B over 11 years ago
Taxes are lower then they have been in decades, so why is unemployment so high?
Breeana over 11 years ago
The conservative have been spreading lies about Obama since he was elected. ONLY agenda was to make Obama a one term President. At ANY cost
Bdawgfl over 11 years ago
A. Because there is still so much uncertainty about upcoming regulations and the costs that will be imposed. B. Other costs are still to be calculated (the cost of Obamacare for one)C. In case you haven’t noticed the tax rates have been temporary. When Bush enacted them, they were set for many years. So there was certainty and business could plan. The taxes have only been on a hike hiatus with that expected to end in December.
braindead Premium Member over 11 years ago
If Willard released his tax returns, it would clear up when he really retired, or didn’t. Of course it would cost him the election for sure — and maybe criminal liability.-It is obivous that Willard is not proud of Bain’s record — otherwise, no one would care about precisely when he retired from Bain.-I maintain that Willard will drop out of the election sooner than release those returns.