I have heard that in Massachusetts the people are very happy with their health care. I have Also heard that fewer voters in that state are for Romney than in most all other states.
Those three are the very best the Republicans have to offer — Mr Etch-a-sketch for prez, The Town Crier as Speaker, and McConnell who set the party’s negative single priority for four years.
Quick! What percentage of the population is expected to make less than $120,000 a year? . It is certainly a large number, maybe 75%. They will be getting health care coverage for these “costs” and some will be paying a penalty for not having health coverage. This would not be a headline in the Journal, but is HUGE in the Human Events (extra conservative blog). All headline, no story.
There is already an excellent plan; all it takes is to change just two words whenever they occur. Where it says province, change to state; where Canada, change to United States. Problem solved as well as humans can be expected to do.
Let’s see, a woman has the right of privacy to choose abortion or not. However, we don’t have a right of privacy as to have health care or not. Stalin is smiling, and Alexander calls Republicans “Richthuglicons”.
filmsgraded almost 12 years ago
The important thing is that billionaires pay as little in taxes as possible.
Dtroutma almost 12 years ago
The acetylene torch is in Boehner’s pocket, and gasoline in McConnell’s tanker parked just out of frame.
pam Miner almost 12 years ago
I have heard that in Massachusetts the people are very happy with their health care. I have Also heard that fewer voters in that state are for Romney than in most all other states.
braindead Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Those three are the very best the Republicans have to offer — Mr Etch-a-sketch for prez, The Town Crier as Speaker, and McConnell who set the party’s negative single priority for four years.
Pathetic.
fargopete almost 12 years ago
Nice follow up Pat!
explorer543 almost 12 years ago
Quick! What percentage of the population is expected to make less than $120,000 a year? . It is certainly a large number, maybe 75%. They will be getting health care coverage for these “costs” and some will be paying a penalty for not having health coverage. This would not be a headline in the Journal, but is HUGE in the Human Events (extra conservative blog). All headline, no story.
crlinder almost 12 years ago
That can be cured by altering the tax code. It’s not an argument for denying 30 million Americans decent healthcare.
hippogriff almost 12 years ago
There is already an excellent plan; all it takes is to change just two words whenever they occur. Where it says province, change to state; where Canada, change to United States. Problem solved as well as humans can be expected to do.
Alexander the Good Enough almost 12 years ago
Just gotta LOVE the Richthuglicons, whose motto these days seems to be “Billions for the billionaires, pennies for the penniless!”
Rock on!
SABRSteve almost 12 years ago
Let’s see, a woman has the right of privacy to choose abortion or not. However, we don’t have a right of privacy as to have health care or not. Stalin is smiling, and Alexander calls Republicans “Richthuglicons”.
pirate227 almost 12 years ago
Did he give up on the etch-a-sketch already?