Michael Ramirez for May 12, 2012

Every kid does dumb things, or cruel things, or dangerous things when they are young. The question is, did they learn and grow and become better human beings as they got older? Their behavior as adults tells us the answer to that.

What is the issue here, that some one messed around as a kid or that another messed with drugs as a kid. Or is the real story about the Washington Post attacking one candidate over the other with a 5500 word story about cutting a kid’s hair.

Romney believes in a caste system in which no one can get rich that isn’t already and everyone else supports the wealthy, and where workers are nothing but prey. His chief supporter is extremely wealthy and has had a book published explaining how the super rich are really great for all the workers and should get even more money as a reward.

Not to worry, Michael R is simply shoring up support for Romney. 1% will vote for Michael R’s guy, and the rest of the nation, that would be about 99%, will vote for the decent man. The secret is out: the GOP only cares about millionaires and corporations.

Read Obama’s books, the “voice” in the writing matches his speech patterns, and says, he wrote the books. Interesting merely as biography.

I have no real problem with the pot use, or experimentation, as it relates to the fact he has life experiences he actually LEARNED from.

The problem I have with Mitt, and “W”, isn’t that they were rich, spoiled, brats, but the abusive, bullying stance they learned to assume from that experience, and that they regard others as less than themselves, yet really have nothing to offer up to substantiate their self promotion and false pride in themselves.

Mitt’s (or "W"s) book would be ghost written, and tell of a man looking into a mirror, proclaiming “the king and I”.

It’s interesting to read Rush’s and Breitbart’s comments on this incident, and the way they distort it. Rush even doctors the actual quote from the book to make it look like Obama just went up to the girl and shoved her for no apparent reason, and he implies that the girl was a lesbian, and Obama did it out of anti-gay bias.

I’m sure this kind of B.S. plays well to their target audience, but it will disgust any reasonable unbiased person.

Thanks for that citation, truer words were never spoken :

“put a stop to letting kooky religious nuts run for any public office!”

…way to go Ramirez,

the pot issue is so far behind any concern or experience of the public that it’s laughable that anyone would make an issue of it today. Same for The Pill or gay marriage. Even the Republican hate machine can’t make an issue of any of this.

Your cartoon is on par with the stuff put out by McCoy. (silly stuff, in a word)

I bet you had a Budwiser somewhere in your high schlool career. Oooh, you naughty boy!

Difference – Obama didnt hurt another person with what he did.

Richie RiCh can buy all the coke or weed he wants from the Nincompoop President who gave us ECONOMEGEDDON! Too bad he can’t get Reagan to secure some of that crack he flooded L. A. with back in the day.

“editor of a Newspaper that he never wrote an editorial for.”

He was president not editor; it was a journal not a newspaper (do you know the difference?)

Can you cite a single “editorial” written by anyone in the Harvard Law Review?

I used to wonder why all you Loony-Libs comment on this strip, then it finally dawned on me, you’re lost, you took the wrong turn, you should have gone left at that last fork in the road and not to the right.Now back-track to the last fork, you know what a fork looks like don’t you, it really looks like a “Y”, anyway, go back there and this time go to the LEFT…

^ Columbine