Yeah, I’ve never seen what’s so special about this painting. Maybe it’s popular because it’s so easy, but nonetheless “modern”. I would pay to have someone take it away.
like on Wall Street, anyone stop to figure how much the "artist’ gets, especially when so many are conveniently dead at the time of sale, versus how much the BROKER gets out of the deal??
Which, also makes it interesting “debating” what the artist was actually thinking, when, art is often meant to stimulate thought, not give answers.
As to conservatives, the “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” offers a take: “We don’t need no stinking reality!”
Dtroutma almost 12 years ago
Ah, the idle rich, don’t you just love the trials and tribulations of the 1%?
William Bednar Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Resurgence of the “Culture Vultures”?
grumpypophobart almost 12 years ago
Clark, your 12 and up 1.
lonecat almost 12 years ago
Yeah, I’ve never seen what’s so special about this painting. Maybe it’s popular because it’s so easy, but nonetheless “modern”. I would pay to have someone take it away.
tcity almost 12 years ago
(Applause)
dfowensby almost 12 years ago
troll
Dtroutma almost 12 years ago
like on Wall Street, anyone stop to figure how much the "artist’ gets, especially when so many are conveniently dead at the time of sale, versus how much the BROKER gets out of the deal??
Which, also makes it interesting “debating” what the artist was actually thinking, when, art is often meant to stimulate thought, not give answers.
As to conservatives, the “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” offers a take: “We don’t need no stinking reality!”
cjr53 almost 12 years ago
Well, I enjoyed reading your response. Thank you!—And, yes I agree 100%. thanks again.
cjr53 almost 12 years ago
Wow, inarticulate and wrong, cool combo, dood.
rockngolfer almost 12 years ago
I just posted this elsewhere:http://www.cagle.com/author/jeff-koterba/
spooon almost 12 years ago
When art doesn’t speak to you that doesn’t mean the art is bad or worthless. Munch is my guy.