Yep, what Libs want is someone who never accomplished anything and needs to be told what to do. Too bad Mr Cain wasn’t dumb enough to just read what scrolled across the Teleprompter…he might have become president.
Let’s be fair — nothing has been proved in court about these allegations — though I guess we do know that there was a settlement in two cases, and that all of the allegations were made at the time, not cooked up later. Still, not proved. What has been proved is that Cain has no intelligent policy and hardly any knowledge about important matters of national interest. So if that’s what the Republicans want, hey, it’s their choice — we’ll see how it works out in the end. I’m betting Romney will get the nomination, and there will be a fierce battle of apathy on both sides. Obama will win by inertia.
If the Republicans’ true objective were a one term Obama, an actual leader would step up. The major parties’ lack, here, has been apparent since Ford replaced Agnew. Status quo beats anarchy? Vote Libertarians vs Greens. Bite the biggies.
Cain’s inability to remember whether or not he opposed Obama’s intervention Libya, and that he didn’t even remember what Obama DID in Libya, shows that he simply is not engaged in the modern world. He’s selling books about himself, people. He’s not serious about running for president.
Folks just don’t understand. An occasional slip of the lip, “W”, GHW, Clinton, Obama, Cain, Perry, etc, okay, no harm, no foul. BUT! Consistent, repeated and lengthy ramblings and statements of idiocy flowing like a river???? Perry and Cain have only one major problem: opening their mouths.
aguirra3 over 12 years ago
Yep, what Libs want is someone who never accomplished anything and needs to be told what to do. Too bad Mr Cain wasn’t dumb enough to just read what scrolled across the Teleprompter…he might have become president.
tcity over 12 years ago
‘honest’ Hahahahaha.
Prof_Bleen over 12 years ago
If Cain’s lunatic tax proposal didn’t sink his candidacy, why should allegations of sexual harassment?
Dtroutma over 12 years ago
Clown: like well, Ted Haggard?
lonecat over 12 years ago
Let’s be fair — nothing has been proved in court about these allegations — though I guess we do know that there was a settlement in two cases, and that all of the allegations were made at the time, not cooked up later. Still, not proved. What has been proved is that Cain has no intelligent policy and hardly any knowledge about important matters of national interest. So if that’s what the Republicans want, hey, it’s their choice — we’ll see how it works out in the end. I’m betting Romney will get the nomination, and there will be a fierce battle of apathy on both sides. Obama will win by inertia.
ChukLitl Premium Member over 12 years ago
If the Republicans’ true objective were a one term Obama, an actual leader would step up. The major parties’ lack, here, has been apparent since Ford replaced Agnew. Status quo beats anarchy? Vote Libertarians vs Greens. Bite the biggies.
ARodney over 12 years ago
Cain’s inability to remember whether or not he opposed Obama’s intervention Libya, and that he didn’t even remember what Obama DID in Libya, shows that he simply is not engaged in the modern world. He’s selling books about himself, people. He’s not serious about running for president.
pirate227 over 12 years ago
Wait, who’s in LIbya, now?
Dtroutma over 12 years ago
Folks just don’t understand. An occasional slip of the lip, “W”, GHW, Clinton, Obama, Cain, Perry, etc, okay, no harm, no foul. BUT! Consistent, repeated and lengthy ramblings and statements of idiocy flowing like a river???? Perry and Cain have only one major problem: opening their mouths.