Chip Bok for March 28, 2023

https://www.medicaldaily.com/challenging-gender-identity-biologists-say-gender-expands-across-spectrum-rather-323956

Errrrrrrrrrr……no. Democrats can define woman easily. The science is there and they’ve gone back to it time and again. But the “can’t define woke” bit? Yeah, it’s clear they don’t have a clue what it means, and that’s especially troubling…

Both ‘woke’ and ‘woman’ are “issues” for Bok and Republicans to weaponize and LIE about.

Notice that both of these “issues” are alt-right driven talking points…

A ‘Repeat’ of yesterday’s Bok toon … WHY?

I ask myself what have trans people, drag shows, and other assorted labels done to me personally and I keep coming up with nothing. Politicians on the other hand have done plenty to screw me and others over the years and will keep on screwing me and others for as long as they can.

Can’t define a woman to whom? Republicans? Democrats don’t define what or who a woman is to anyone. Apparently, Republicans feel that’s their job.

Women are the ones you can punish for having abortions.

The alt right can’t define sanity

Can’t think of new content, so makes a black and white version of yesterday’s comic.

@DangerMan: “Being a man or a woman is in the brain, not just the gonads.”

Worse than that. It’s in the “brains” of others… or so those others believe. It’s their belief that they determine how a genetic “man” and “woman” must behave… including allowing those others to punish/abuse those who disagree with them.

Meanwhile, they applaud individuals who act in some ways contrary to their “rules”, as long as they claim to support the “deciders” agenda. Giuliani and Santos can wear dresses, as long as they claim to despise “men” who “like” to do so. And MT Greene is praised for being even more of a “masculine” bully than even most of the worst male ones, as long as she doesn’t claim to be doing it because the wants to be viewed as a “man”.