Apparently Steve Kelley is either lying or completely uninformed about the CDC eviction moratorium.
The game of Monopoly was invented by Lizzie Magie i n 1903 to show the absurdity of the deregulated economy. Note that it also included a GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME ($200 when you pass “Go” regardless of need or employment).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_(game)
Further, Kelley seems ignorant of the fact that Congress has passed, and the president has signed, legislation authorizing $46 BILLION for rent relief, which pays off the rental debts of victims of the Trump Plague, and makes landlords whole.
Sadly, of that $46 billion authorized, only $3 billion has actually been paid, because it is administered by the states.
The extension of the eviction moratorium is just to allow more time to process the rental reimbursements, and any governors who refuse to do so can face an angry mob of voting renters when they come up for reelection.
Kelly’s not wrong, if you don’t follow the rules, the game folds. However, he implies that people are CHOSING to not follow the rules. He is implying that renters are mooching off the landlords and that is not the case.
Landlords have bills to pay. It’s a business, after all. But if your job was impacted by covid and you’re getting any help to get by, what are you going to do? Things are a little better, you might get a job, one that even pays better, but you might also owe several months back rent.
And the landlords are up against it also. If they evict people, they are out that money and they have to find renters to take their place. There will be a lot of homeless people who can’t afford the rent.
While we think of the homeless problem as being huge, it’s only about 500,000 people nationwide, 0.2% of the population. Are we ready to increase that a hundred fold?
Congress set aside money for the purpose of supporting renters, but a tiny fraction of it has been used. I think we should start there if we’re going to point fingers.
Why isn’t the money being used for the purpose it was set aside for?
I suggest a new game with Fair trade not Free trade. Regulated industries and markets, not winner takes all capitalism. A game that does not define winning as sitting on a huge pile of cash that benefits only ‘the winner’. A game where the more you have the more you donate to the community chest. A game that promotes education and family values over simple greed.
Passports are required when entering the country from foreign countries. Passengers landing at international airports (New York, Miami, Washington, Dallas, L.A., San Francisco, and others) must present passports. It is also a requirement when crossing the Mexican border. Why is it not enforced?
Just a legal question, when the landlady loses the duplex because she could not collect from her renter next door, and therefore could not pay taxes or the mortgage, is the new owner after foreclosure then able to evict both the former landlady and the former tenant? Neither? One? How would that play out, legally?
DD Wiz Premium Member over 2 years ago
Apparently Steve Kelley is either lying or completely uninformed about the CDC eviction moratorium.
The game of Monopoly was invented by Lizzie Magie i n 1903 to show the absurdity of the deregulated economy. Note that it also included a GUARANTEED MINIMUM INCOME ($200 when you pass “Go” regardless of need or employment).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_(game)
Further, Kelley seems ignorant of the fact that Congress has passed, and the president has signed, legislation authorizing $46 BILLION for rent relief, which pays off the rental debts of victims of the Trump Plague, and makes landlords whole.
Sadly, of that $46 billion authorized, only $3 billion has actually been paid, because it is administered by the states.
The extension of the eviction moratorium is just to allow more time to process the rental reimbursements, and any governors who refuse to do so can face an angry mob of voting renters when they come up for reelection.
William Bednar Premium Member over 2 years ago
This is just pathetic.
Durak Premium Member over 2 years ago
SKelley, it’s not about being WILLING. It’s about being UNABLE.
Do you think Congress passed the Rent Relief bill to help the poor renters? No. It was passed to help the LANDLORDS.
Patjade over 2 years ago
SKelley resorts to reductio ad absurdum and overlooks the fact that there are programs to pay landlords.
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/emergency-rental-assistance-program
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/emergency-rental-assistance-program/program-index
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/coronavirus/mortgage-and-housing-assistance/renter-protections/find-help-with-rent-and-utilities/?utm_source=vanity&utm_medium=outreach&utm_campaign=renthelp
Kilrwat Premium Member over 2 years ago
Preventing monopoly in real life is bad…why?
Vidrinath Premium Member over 2 years ago
Steve, when was the last time you played a “fast” game of Monopoly?
Rise22 over 2 years ago
Just keep printing money …. just like Monopoly….and, by the way, the Supreme Court deemed the evictions legal.
RAGs over 2 years ago
Mountains-of-Billshit had his coffee this morning, too bad his intelligence pills didn’t kick in.
Radish the wordsmith over 2 years ago
CNN anchor suggests naming new COVID variants after GOP governors: ‘We could sell beer koozies’
https://www.rawstory.com/florida-ron-desantis-2654564982/
knutdl over 2 years ago
“I hope you’ll stay and have a cup of tea. Oh I hope you’ll play my monopoly”
ChristopherBurns over 2 years ago
Kelly’s not wrong, if you don’t follow the rules, the game folds. However, he implies that people are CHOSING to not follow the rules. He is implying that renters are mooching off the landlords and that is not the case.
Landlords have bills to pay. It’s a business, after all. But if your job was impacted by covid and you’re getting any help to get by, what are you going to do? Things are a little better, you might get a job, one that even pays better, but you might also owe several months back rent.
And the landlords are up against it also. If they evict people, they are out that money and they have to find renters to take their place. There will be a lot of homeless people who can’t afford the rent.
While we think of the homeless problem as being huge, it’s only about 500,000 people nationwide, 0.2% of the population. Are we ready to increase that a hundred fold?
Congress set aside money for the purpose of supporting renters, but a tiny fraction of it has been used. I think we should start there if we’re going to point fingers.
Why isn’t the money being used for the purpose it was set aside for?
ferddo over 2 years ago
As if the CDC is a government agent that can enforce a moratorium…
CW Stevenson over 2 years ago
“One can only hope.”
I C U over 2 years ago
I suggest a new game with Fair trade not Free trade. Regulated industries and markets, not winner takes all capitalism. A game that does not define winning as sitting on a huge pile of cash that benefits only ‘the winner’. A game where the more you have the more you donate to the community chest. A game that promotes education and family values over simple greed.
Radish the wordsmith over 2 years ago
Florida’s viral load is so great if it was a country the US would consider blocking travel there
https://www.rawstory.com/florida-among-worst-globally/
BB71 over 2 years ago
Passports are required when entering the country from foreign countries. Passengers landing at international airports (New York, Miami, Washington, Dallas, L.A., San Francisco, and others) must present passports. It is also a requirement when crossing the Mexican border. Why is it not enforced?
BB71 over 2 years ago
Dementia Joe and Giggles Kamala don`t pay rent.
Holden Awn over 2 years ago
Just a legal question, when the landlady loses the duplex because she could not collect from her renter next door, and therefore could not pay taxes or the mortgage, is the new owner after foreclosure then able to evict both the former landlady and the former tenant? Neither? One? How would that play out, legally?