DACA was an executive order. Sure, it started out as legislation, but never made it passed Mitch McConnell. The SCOTUS didn’t like the way Trump handled it.
In the decision involving LGBTQ legislation, they didn’t change a thing, other than insist that the law be applied equally.
What we have here is the Court properly fulfilling its function. If you don’t like it, you’re the one with a problem understanding how the Constitution works.
Maybe because Congress fails to properly legislate.
With the court, we know which way the liberals will go, and we know which way the conservatives will go, but we don’t know which way Roberts will go. Imagine Roberts, the Repub pick for Supreme Justice, is now the swing voter.
THE SUPREME COURT is supposed to determine if law and the rule of law is being followed whenever it reviews legislation from Congress. THE ORANGE FRUITCAKE AND mitch McMafia were just surprised and enraged when their hand-picked Supreme Kangaroo Court actually supported THE CONSTITUTION.
Mr. Ramirez clearly doesn’t understand the workings of the judicial system; especially the Supreme Court.
The court does not, and can not, void or negate any law or executive order. What the court does is state that judicial power does not extend to any law or order that does not meet constitutional requirements, meaning no court can enforce that unconstitutional law.
Judicial power extends to any case of law arising under the Constitution (Article III) and when a law doesn’t arise under the Constitution it doesn’t activate judicial power.
The Supreme’s JOB is to rule on the legality of the things the other two branches of government try to do. I can’t imagine that Ramirez doesn’t know this, so I must believe that he’s trying, again, to tear down our nation’s legacy of even handed openness.
Remember, President Obama said many times that he couldn’t protect Dreamers on his own, but would need for it to be passed thru Congress. Then, after his 2nd election he decided to go ahead and “just do it”, through executive action. All Trump was saying was, it was done improperly and to roll it back and John Roberts cancelled the whole thing out. Thats the long and short of it.
All I can think of is the opening of one of the Monty Python movies where the accountants become pirates and the large corporate buildings are ships. It makes me laugh just remembering. Think I’ll go watch a movie.
shakeswilly almost 4 years ago
Aren’t these the justices your masters rigged and stole elections to be able to appoint, Ramirez ? Why are you complaining now ?
quixotic3 almost 4 years ago
Yeah, right. It’s the activist Supremes the Republicans installed, not the batshirt crazy president* who abuses the office.
Daeder almost 4 years ago
Ramirez is upset that his chosen one’s kangaroo court is hopping for the American people instead of for the little dictator.
Patjade almost 4 years ago
Aww, did someone hurt Mike’s feel-feels with all that Constitutional stuff?
dshans almost 4 years ago
But, but, but … aren’t the majority “His People?”
Ontman almost 4 years ago
tRump wants to sign an executive order to ban free thought.
Odon Premium Member almost 4 years ago
RBG swings a mean rope.
Radish the wordsmith almost 4 years ago
They upheld the law instead of right wing prejudice.
Durak Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Legislation?
DACA was an executive order. Sure, it started out as legislation, but never made it passed Mitch McConnell. The SCOTUS didn’t like the way Trump handled it.
In the decision involving LGBTQ legislation, they didn’t change a thing, other than insist that the law be applied equally.
What we have here is the Court properly fulfilling its function. If you don’t like it, you’re the one with a problem understanding how the Constitution works.
Maybe because Congress fails to properly legislate.
RAGs almost 4 years ago
Mikey believes that Trump makes all the laws and anybody who disagrees is a traitor.
William Bednar Premium Member almost 4 years ago
One or two “bad” rulings do not a SCOTUS make. How many rulings went Trump’s way?
Ralph Newbill almost 4 years ago
Thomas Jefferson warned of the very same.
clayjonz creator almost 4 years ago
What legislation was pirated? It was an executive order? I hate stupid cartoons.
preacherman almost 4 years ago
With the court, we know which way the liberals will go, and we know which way the conservatives will go, but we don’t know which way Roberts will go. Imagine Roberts, the Repub pick for Supreme Justice, is now the swing voter.
chris.lemarie almost 4 years ago
I don’t buy the substance at all… but still, I must admit I love the drawing, and it gave me a good laugh.
txraiders Premium Member almost 4 years ago
This one will be a classic; pure Ramirez!
Bookworm almost 4 years ago
Next Chief Justice; Cap’n Jack Sparrow!
The Love of Money is . . . almost 4 years ago
If Trump had his way, there would be a lot of them swinging by a rope.
ferddo almost 4 years ago
Republicans used to complain that judges should not legislate from the bench… now they want them to legislate from the bench…
benjamineyal almost 4 years ago
I disagree with the opinions presented by the cartoon but I love the artwork and the idea. I’m conflicted
Packratjohn Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Apologies to Monty Python… (The Crimson Permanent Assurance sketch)
ChristopherBurns almost 4 years ago
Wow. It sure sucks when court packing doesn’t go as planned.
Flatlander, purveyor of fine covfefe almost 4 years ago
A play on Crimson Permanent Assurance pirates
AndrewSihler almost 4 years ago
As always, wizard art. Pity it’s wasted on confusion, misdirection, and (ahem) lies.
PaulKmecak almost 4 years ago
Of course, when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965, THAT was sober, sensible jurisprudence.
kentmarx36 almost 4 years ago
THE SUPREME COURT is supposed to determine if law and the rule of law is being followed whenever it reviews legislation from Congress. THE ORANGE FRUITCAKE AND mitch McMafia were just surprised and enraged when their hand-picked Supreme Kangaroo Court actually supported THE CONSTITUTION.
Madzdad the bard almost 4 years ago
You mean the attempt at stacking the court on the right isn’t quite working out the way you though? So sad!
ThomasBonsell almost 4 years ago
Mr. Ramirez clearly doesn’t understand the workings of the judicial system; especially the Supreme Court.
The court does not, and can not, void or negate any law or executive order. What the court does is state that judicial power does not extend to any law or order that does not meet constitutional requirements, meaning no court can enforce that unconstitutional law.
Judicial power extends to any case of law arising under the Constitution (Article III) and when a law doesn’t arise under the Constitution it doesn’t activate judicial power.
That is not legislating.
Concretionist almost 4 years ago
The Supreme’s JOB is to rule on the legality of the things the other two branches of government try to do. I can’t imagine that Ramirez doesn’t know this, so I must believe that he’s trying, again, to tear down our nation’s legacy of even handed openness.
FJB Premium Member almost 4 years ago
Remember, President Obama said many times that he couldn’t protect Dreamers on his own, but would need for it to be passed thru Congress. Then, after his 2nd election he decided to go ahead and “just do it”, through executive action. All Trump was saying was, it was done improperly and to roll it back and John Roberts cancelled the whole thing out. Thats the long and short of it.
Jujeebean almost 4 years ago
All I can think of is the opening of one of the Monty Python movies where the accountants become pirates and the large corporate buildings are ships. It makes me laugh just remembering. Think I’ll go watch a movie.