Steve Kelley for April 05, 2020

  1. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member about 4 years ago

    It’s NOT Uncle Sam blaming 3M for fulfilling its contracts, it’s ONLY Trump and His Disciples.

    Another LYING cartoon by SKelley.

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    tbemont Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Republicans do not get to complain about what 3M is doing. Republicans have no right to be angry at 3M. Republicans since the 1980’s have believed that the sole job of a corporation is to maximize profit and increase stock price for the shareholder. In other words the “me, me, me” is exactly how they say a corporation should act.

    Republicans. Is it possibly time to rethink your completely free markets philosophy? How about the no regulation philosophy?

     •  Reply
  3. Pat new 150
    Patjade  about 4 years ago

    Varvel continues the Trump Blame Game. Blame everyone except the person who failed.

     •  Reply
  4. 2b21f09a 63d7 4ad1 83a6 fdf4d8b30651
    Zev   about 4 years ago

    3M is only taking advantage of the dog-eat-dog way the GOP has set up corporate business practices. Trump himself is a shining example.

     •  Reply
  5. 210408 doc w
    walstib Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing. i.e. Scotch Tape and Post-It Notes.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    chris.lemarie  about 4 years ago

    Funny, Mr. Kelley doesn’t seem to have anything to draw about Florida’s governor…

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    brit-ed  about 4 years ago

    If Trump had done the right things with the stockpile when this started, he wouldn’t be trying to blame it on 3M for fulfilling their commitments now (something Trump knows nothing about)

     •  Reply
  8. Celtic tree of life
    mourdac Premium Member about 4 years ago

    The U.S. has known since the latter years of the Obama administration and the first 3 years of COVID-45’s reign of signicant shortfalls in medical PPE and ventilators and that this equipment would be critical in case of a respiratory pandemic. This isn’t a new issue.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    Vidrinath Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Steve, you are saying they are model Republicans? “I got mine. F YOU!”….isn’t that your mantra?

     •  Reply
  10. E43f09f0 d9ab 4f55 b739 d75d4df15e24
    quixotic3  about 4 years ago

    …forgetting that trump is the reason there’s a panic-driven market in the first place.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    Odon Premium Member about 4 years ago

    A world conglomerate selling to the world, imagine. Too bad the stockpiles left empty by Obama (per trump) were not replenished over these last 3 years.

     •  Reply
  12. Bald eagle portrait
    Kilrwat Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Seems to fit right in with the trumpublican mind-set.

     •  Reply
  13. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Americans word and established contracts mean squat since trump started driving.

     •  Reply
  14. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 4 years ago

    Kushner confiscated masks bound for Canadian doctors, Canada is angry.

    Trump admin stole medical equipment headed for Germany, they are angry.

    Kushner claims the American people’s stockpile is his, the states are angry.

    The medically incompetent Trump admin is nothing but a bunch of lying thieves and people everywhere are angry with them.

     •  Reply
  15. Picture
    ArtieEl  about 4 years ago

    And here I thought “Greed is good”. Now that someone else is benefitting from that philosophy, all of a sudden the Repubs change their tune. Apparently what they meant was " Greed is good for me."

     •  Reply
  16. Acellist
    acellist Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Actually, the full lyrics are: “Do, Re, Me, more Do Fa Me . . .”

     •  Reply
  17. Pontiac logo 04 583x436
    Pontiac Mick  about 4 years ago

    The list is longer than 3M,

     •  Reply
  18. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    In September 2018, the Trump administration received detailed plans for a new machine designed to churn out millions of protective respirator masks at high speed during a pandemic.

    The plans, submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) by medical manufacturer O&M Halyard, were the culmination of a venture unveiled almost three years earlier by the Obama administration.

    But HHS did not proceed with making the machine.

    The project was one of two N95 mask ventures — totaling $9.8 million — that the federal government embarked on over the past five years to better prepare for pandemics.

    The other involves the development of reusable masks to replace the single-use variety currently so scarce that medical professionals are using theirs over and over. Expert panels have advised the government for at least 14 years that reusable masks were vital.

    That effort, like the quick mask machine, has not led to a single new mask for the government’s response.

    “The Halyard contract was part of an explicit strategy to ensure we could surge mask production in the next crisis,” said Nicole Lurie, who was the HHS assistant secretary for preparedness and response under Barack Obama. “Now we’re dealing with the consequences of not having that capability.”

    Halyard said Thursday in a statement that its work on the government contract was completed in September 2018. A spokeswoman declined to give additional details.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/federal-government-spent-millions-to-ramp-up-mask-readiness-but-that-isnt-helping-now/2020/04/03/d62dda5c-74fa-11ea-a9bd-9f8b593300d0_story.html

     •  Reply
  19. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    Two months before the novel coronavirus is thought to have begun its deadly advance in Wuhan, China, the Trump administration ended a $200-million pandemic early-warning program aimed at training scientists in China and other countries to detect and respond to such a threat.

    The project, launched by the U.S. Agency for International Development in 2009, identified 1,200 different viruses that had the potential to erupt into pandemics, including more than 160 novel coronaviruses. The initiative, called PREDICT, also trained and supported staff in 60 foreign laboratories — including the Wuhan lab that identified SARS-CoV-2, the new coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

    Field work ceased when the funding ran out in September, and organizations that worked on the PREDICT program laid off dozens of scientists and analysts, said Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, a key player in the program.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-administration-ended-pandemic-early-233508840.html

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    ferddo  about 4 years ago

    The pandemic has spread to us from overseas. If people don’t help stop the pandemic overseas then it will continue to spread back to us. Would you rather fight a war on foreign soil, or on our soil?

     •  Reply
  21. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    Report 12: The Global Impact of COVID-19 and Strategies for Mitigation and SuppressionSummary:

    Summary Report 12The world faces a severe and acute public health emergency due to the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic. How individual countries respond in the coming weeks will be critical in influencing the trajectory of national epidemics. Here we combine data on age-specific contact patterns and COVID-19 severity to project the health impact of the pandemic in 202 countries. We compare predicted mortality impacts in the absence of interventions or spontaneous social distancing with what might be achieved with policies aimed at mitigating or suppressing transmission. Our estimates of mortality and healthcare demand are based on data from China and high-income countries; differences in underlying health conditions and healthcare system capacity will likely result in different patterns in low income settings.

    We estimate that in the absence of interventions, COVID-19 would have resulted in 7.0 billion infections and 40 million deaths globally this year. Mitigation strategies focussing on shielding the elderly (60% reduction in social contacts) and slowing but not interrupting transmission (40% reduction in social contacts for wider population) could reduce this burden by half, saving 20 million lives, but we predict that even in this scenario, health systems in all countries will be quickly overwhelmed. This effect is likely to be most severe in lower income settings where capacity is lowest: our mitigated scenarios lead to peak demand for critical care beds in a typical low-income setting outstripping supply by a factor of 25, in contrast to a typical high-income setting where this factor is 7. As a result, we anticipate that the true burden in low income settings pursuing mitigation strategies could be substantially higher than reflected in these estimates. (cont’d)

     •  Reply
  22. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    Our analysis therefore suggests that healthcare demand can only be kept within manageable levels through the rapid adoption of public health measures (including testing and isolation of cases and wider social distancing measures) to suppress transmission, similar to those being adopted in many countries at the current time. If a suppression strategy is implemented early (at 0.2 deaths per 100,000 population per week) and sustained, then 38.7 million lives could be saved whilst if it is initiated when death numbers are higher (1.6 deaths per 100,000 population per week) then 30.7 million lives could be saved. Delays in implementing strategies to suppress transmission will lead to worse outcomes and fewer lives saved.

    We do not consider the wider social and economic costs of suppression, which will be high and may be disproportionately so in lower income settings. Moreover, suppression strategies will need to be maintained in some manner until vaccines or effective treatments become available to avoid the risk of later epidemics. Our analysis highlights the challenging decisions faced by all governments in the coming weeks and months, but demonstrates the extent to which rapid, decisive and collective action now could save millions of lives.

    https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/news—wuhan-coronavirus/

     •  Reply
  23. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    The New York Times has a story today that you might have missed. Back in 2008, after realizing that the country would be woefully short of ventilators in the case of a big flu epidemic, the federal government announced a contract to design and build a new generation of cheap, portable ventilators. The contract was awarded in 2009 to Newport Medical Instruments, a small ventilator maker in California, and at first the project went swimmingly: Then everything changed. The medical device industry was undergoing rapid consolidation, with one company after another merging with or acquiring other makers….In May 2012, Covidien, a large medical device manufacturer, agreed to buy Newport for just over $100 million….Newport executives and government officials working on the ventilator contract said they immediately noticed a change when Covidien took over. Developing inexpensive portable ventilators no longer seemed like a top priority. ….Government officials and executives at rival ventilator companies said they suspected that Covidien had acquired Newport to prevent it from building a cheaper product that would undermine Covidien’s profits from its existing ventilator business. ….In 2014, with no ventilators having been delivered to the government, Covidien executives told officials at the biomedical research agency that they wanted to get out of the contract, according to three former federal officials. The executives complained that it was not sufficiently profitable for the company.

    The contract was eventually re-awarded to Philips, and last year the FDA signed off on the new Philips ventilator, the Trilogy Evo. Delivery of 10,000 units was set for . . .Mid-2020. Just a little late. Too bad.

    https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/03/nyt-next-gen-ventilator-project-failed-because-it-killed-profits/

     •  Reply
  24. Pine marten3
    martens  about 4 years ago

    So, Kelley, just who screwed up? And who has contributed to the problem by having the states individually bidding for the supplies and equipment?

     •  Reply
  25. Large photo0018
    wirepunchr  about 4 years ago

    The one saying Me Me Me doesn’t look anything like tiny.

     •  Reply
  26. Wtp
    superposition  about 4 years ago

    The US has 4.25% of the world’s population and 95.75% of the world’s ego, it seems, with most residing in the resident.If an International corporation delivered 4.75% of its products here that would be ethical, but it seems this administration wants it all.

    https://www.worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/honorees/

     •  Reply
  27. Thrill
    fritzoid Premium Member about 4 years ago

    Are you suggesting that we nationalize the multinational corporations? How much of 3M’s ownership is still in U.S. hands, let alone Minnesotan hands?

     •  Reply
  28. Boyknifeoutlet
    Retired engineer  about 4 years ago

    Good thing for New York that China (and for that matter, the state of Oregon) did not take that “our people only” attitude with their ventilators.

     •  Reply
  29. Minifig2
    Aliquid  about 4 years ago

    Do you really want to play that game “3M stop fulfilling your contracts with other countries, USA first!!”

    You do realize, that if other countries do the same in return the US is screwed.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    DrDon1  about 4 years ago

    Once again, Kelley demonstrates his willful IGNORANCE! So, that qualifies him as a spokesperson for #45!

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    kentmarx36  about 4 years ago

    3M is a multinational corporation with contract obligations in other countries. If the company was being run by the soiled Barbie Doll, Ivanka, nothing would have been said by smelly Kelly.

     •  Reply
  32. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 4 years ago

    Let me point out, in February Trump shipped tons of medical equipment to China.

    In March Trump lied that Obama left empty shelves.

     •  Reply
  33. Missing large
    buckman-j  about 4 years ago

    ME ME ME..they caught the Dr. Don virus.. but oh, the ratings

     •  Reply
  34. Hraccess plans come together
    rmrwork  about 4 years ago

    I’m no fan of big corporations but I gotta call B-S on this one Mr. Kelley. By that logic, then the Chinese shouldn’t be delivering masks and other equipment to us. ~ The real fault are the geniuses in FEMA that just started looking for PPE once we ran out. “Emergency Management” indeed!

     •  Reply
  35. Marx.
    DeepState  about 4 years ago

    Money, moola, maga-bucks…

     •  Reply
  36. Img 20220514 wa0005
    grange Premium Member about 4 years ago

    That was a signed contract, already in place. Guess where the raw materials for N-95 masks are sourced? Hint: you just pissed them off. Another think here. Obama had commissioned a company to develop a machine that pops ut a million masks a day. It was completely designed and ready to build when DJT put a stop to it.

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    jhayesd31  about 4 years ago

    Fire Kelly Bring Back Bob Rogers

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment