Elizabeth should have a stunt double for these debates. I suggest Kate McKinnon — she’s more Warren than Warren. Gee, that lady is talented … I refer at the moment to McKinnon.
Overall, Warren handled the slings and arrows aimed at her as the frontrunner. She should be able to easily handle the idiocies of the Republican McMafia.
Yeah just cause she refuses to give her opponents and the GOP a sound bite “taxes will go up for people for universal healthcare” her opponents (except Bernie) and GOP have proven time and time again they are in the pockets of corporate healthcare, drug companies and insurance lobbyists. So America, which is better?
IMHO no party will produce heath care that satisfies all of us. Most of us want to live about forever and in good if not excellent health. We are willing to pay for that but not much. I think the best outcome for us would be a variation of the Canadian hybrid system that’s far from perfect but does show that a rich nation can provide an imperfect level of care for all. A first imperfect step would be something like Medicare for All Who Want It. A final perfect solution will never be accomplished so let’s not get stupid and allow some demagogue to fool us.
Concretionist over 4 years ago
Front runner always has a target on her back. That’s okay as long as she continues to shine.
GreggW Premium Member over 4 years ago
Stop pretending Biden isn’t corrupt and go after him?
Patjade over 4 years ago
You can always tell the leader as everyone running behind aims for their back.
Ontman over 4 years ago
I think she’ll be just fine. What about a VP though?
Zebrastripes over 4 years ago
To me, SHES not the presidential type….too far left for my beliefs….
PraiseofFolly over 4 years ago
Elizabeth should have a stunt double for these debates. I suggest Kate McKinnon — she’s more Warren than Warren. Gee, that lady is talented … I refer at the moment to McKinnon.
Motivemagus over 4 years ago
Count on it. That’s what she does.
Godfreydaniel over 4 years ago
Warren is honest, intelligent, and wonky, yet too far left for me. But, then again, I would vote for a rabid gerbil over Trump…..
kentmarx36 over 4 years ago
Overall, Warren handled the slings and arrows aimed at her as the frontrunner. She should be able to easily handle the idiocies of the Republican McMafia.
Night-Gaunt49[Bozo is Boffo] over 4 years ago
What we need is a political wonk in office. We have the anti-wonk in there now. The perfect Libertarian amateur.
gcottay over 4 years ago
The attacks seem mild to me. Anyone else?
Scoutmaster77 over 4 years ago
She’s fine. If you can’t take what your own party throws at you, how will you survive the opposition.
ndblackirish97 over 4 years ago
Yeah just cause she refuses to give her opponents and the GOP a sound bite “taxes will go up for people for universal healthcare” her opponents (except Bernie) and GOP have proven time and time again they are in the pockets of corporate healthcare, drug companies and insurance lobbyists. So America, which is better?
gcottay over 4 years ago
IMHO no party will produce heath care that satisfies all of us. Most of us want to live about forever and in good if not excellent health. We are willing to pay for that but not much. I think the best outcome for us would be a variation of the Canadian hybrid system that’s far from perfect but does show that a rich nation can provide an imperfect level of care for all. A first imperfect step would be something like Medicare for All Who Want It. A final perfect solution will never be accomplished so let’s not get stupid and allow some demagogue to fool us.