Bob Gorrell for June 25, 2019

  1. Sammy on gocomics
    Say What Now‽ Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    If you want to call tax and campaign cheating, breaking the emoluments clause, obstruction of justice, and sexual assault merely a sneeze, then there is no need to impeach.

     •  Reply
  2. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Like all Trump Disciples, Gorrell believes that Treason and massive corruption by Trump are equivalent to a sneeze.

    And, of course, tax evasions, adulteries, and multiple sexual assaults are covered by mulligans.

    .

    Because character, you know, matters.

     •  Reply
  3. C9969abe b10d 49de b382 ab1511eff385
    amethyst52 Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Mr Gorrell. Have you always been stupid or was it something you ate?

     •  Reply
  4. Triumph
    Daeder  almost 5 years ago

    Only if “sneeze” is a code word for criminal behavior.

     •  Reply
  5. Z76yv737q
    mysterysciencefreezer  almost 5 years ago

    “Fast and Furious” – a continuation of Dubya’s “Operation Wide Receiver”

    “IRS targeting Conservatives” – Which absolutely didn’t happen.

    “Benghazi” – So who’s fault is it this week: Obama’s or Hillary Clinton’s?

    “Clinton Email Abuses” – an amazing abuse of the word “abuses”

    “Loretta Lynch” – what about her?

    “Donald Trump Sneezes” – Gets ignored for his latest idiotic/near-sedatious tweet.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Random Nick Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Mr. Gorrell’s grip on reality is becoming more and more tenuous. All the items mentioned with the exception of Trump have been the subject of YEARS of republican investigations with current calls from them to reopen those investigations. No indictments have resulted. The sixth item he lists already has a number of “guilty” pleas, and a stack of indictments.

    Mr. Gorrell, you are embarrassing yourself with this stuff,.

     •  Reply
  7. Picture
    Ontman  almost 5 years ago

    I hope those aren’t plastic straws you’re grasping at Mr. Gorrell.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    preacherman  almost 5 years ago

    Panels 1-5 have been fully investigated by Repubs and their political hacks. Now, its the Dem’s turn.

     •  Reply
  9. B3b2b771 4dd5 4067 bfef 5ade241cb8c2
    cdward  almost 5 years ago

    This month: accused — again — of rape. Goes golfing. Calls a strike and then calls it off. Goes golfing. Says he doesn’t need Congress’ approval to go to war. Tweets, then goes golfing. Says he’s open to receiving dirt on opponents from foreign countries. Tries to get the G-7 to take place at one of his golf resorts.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    walfishj  almost 5 years ago

    Bob Borrell knows, or he should know, that Republican investigations in a Congress CONTROLLED by Republicans with a Republican President found NOTHING but Republican exaggerations for each of those accusations. Whic h plain and simply brands Mr. Gorrell as a liar.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    brit-ed  almost 5 years ago

    Well with 37 indictments so far and dumpster fire stonewalling every step of the way, that’s quite a blockage he has up his nose; sounds like an obstruction. No wonder he’s sneezing.

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    thelordthygod666  almost 5 years ago

    Revealing is the reality that GOP investigations in the first five were unable to convict or even indict anyone for the supposed offense…unlike the conclusion of the final panel.

     •  Reply
  13. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Most of us know Bob Gorrell is just trying to be controversial.. trouble is that he speaks to a lot of really dumb Americans that just might believe him

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    David Riedel Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Kool-Aid, anyone?

     •  Reply
  15. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    What a shame that you’ve stooped this low, Mr. Gorrell. Please, show evidence of one Trump sneeze ever being investigated. Your efforts to minimize Trump’s behavior as a mere sneeze are ridiculous and shameful.

    I know that you’re trying, really hard, to show that it was the Democrats who blithely tolerated the outrageous behavior of the Obama Administration. But at least Obama never tried to shut anything down.

    Meanwhile the Republicans refused to allow proper cross examination of witnesses at the Kavenaugh hearing, refused to allow White House staff to testify, withheld evidence and a long list of other obstructive behavior.

    How can you possibly trust or defend these guys? Where is your credibility? To whom do you owe your allegiance? The United States? Or Donald Trump and his party?

    You ask much of the Democrats and expect little of the Republicans.

     •  Reply
  16. 1
    ncorgbl  almost 5 years ago

    Looks like conservatives have finally sold the last remnants of their souls. The lies and hypocrisy in this comic are unbelievable.

     •  Reply
  17. Covid
    Librarylady  almost 5 years ago

    Yawn. Nothing was proved about any of your accusations. And yes, yawn compared to: The Russian gov’t interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. V1, P1. … while the investigation identified NUMEROUS LINKS between individuals with ties to the Russian gov’t and individuals associated with the Trump campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges [Like collusion, “coordination” does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. V1, P2] Further, the Office learned that some of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated – including some associated with the Trump Campaign – DELETED relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using apps that feature encryption or the do not provide for long-term retention of data or communication records. V1, P10.Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report doesn’t not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does NOT EXONERATE him. V2, P182

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    retpost  almost 5 years ago

    As long as he does not cough when someone else is talking it`s OK.

     •  Reply
  19. 300px little nemo 1906 02 11 last panel
    lonecat  almost 5 years ago

    Accessory after the fact.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    mikemck  almost 5 years ago

    It’s not the sneezing it’s the using the Constitution to wipe his nose.

     •  Reply
  21. Chili wreath
    Diamond Lil  almost 5 years ago

    You’re a fool Gorrell. I guess you should take your family on a vacation to one of the camps along the border. Or maybe leave your sister or daughter alone with that obscenity in the White House.

     •  Reply
  22. Bbb
    NeoconMan  almost 5 years ago

    Whatabout whatabout whatabout whatabout……

     •  Reply
  23. U joes mint logo rs 192x204
    Uncle Joe Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Gorrell just impeached reality.

     •  Reply
  24. Photo
    AndrewSihler  almost 5 years ago

    Let’s see. “Fast and furious” was an unfortunate continuation of a truly stupid and dangerous program (“WIde Receiver”) inherited from G.W. Bush. Definitely not Obama’s finest moment.

    The IRS was taking a hard look at tax exemption applications under a federal statute covering non-profit investments in public improvements and welfare; organizations with names suggesting “minutemen” and “Taxed Enough Already” are not on their face likely to be busy with, say, refurbishing public playgrounds. (Surprisingly, very few applications were actually nixed.)

    Benghazi??? You mean that thing that was investigated a dozen times by three governmental bodies without any substantive conclusions whatever?

    “Clinton e-mail abuses” (plural, no less) actually boiled down to ten, all of ten, e-mails whose classification made them wrong for being on a private server, but the headers were improperly coded. (Comey: “Mrs Clinton was terribly terribly wrong (but no laws were broken. I just thought I’d mention it).”) Note that the “30,000 emails” that Trump keeps harping on—recently upgraded to 33,000 in his rallies—is a number Trump made up out of whole cloth, they were avowedly private matters and a staffer, not Mrs Clinton herself, did the deleting.

    Loretta Lynch? You have to be kidding. Appearance of impropriety? Yeah, OK, appearance, but right left and center, one Donald J. Trump (as well as his whole family) engages in very public and outrageous improprieties all the time.

    Trump commits more outrageous and more or less facially illegal and definitely inappropriate acts and breaches of the norms of common decency and public trust in any twenty-four hours than Mrs Clinton committed in all her years in office.

     •  Reply
  25. Dp
    All the dinosaurs feared the T-Rex  almost 5 years ago

    Gorrell, you have reached trumpian heights with your idiocy. Congratulations!

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    Monchoxyz  almost 5 years ago

    I would impeach Trump for breathing.

     •  Reply
  27. Marx.
    DeepState  almost 5 years ago

    If they were such a big deal, why haven’t the Repugnicans brought them back?

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    Union Man  almost 5 years ago

    Bob, Shouldn’t the President be held to a higher standard? Over 10,000 verified LIES. 22 woman accusing him of sexual assault. Need I go on.

     •  Reply
  29. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  almost 5 years ago

    Gorrell isn’t even trying to make sense anymore.

    Fast and Furious? There was quite a bit of hooraw, and it’s over!

    IRS targeting conservatives? Actually, they were doing their job… and an independent study found that, proportionately (there were very many fewer liberal groups trying to run the “non-profit” scam) they went after more liberals than conservatives.

    Benghazi? It was a mistake. On her watch. But, it’s over! (and oh yeah: All those hearings and you still aren’t satisfied?)

    Clinton emails. It’s been investigated. She was (slightly) wrong, admitted it, fixed it, and most of us have moved on. Get over it!

    Loretta Lynch? (Who?). (Ah: DDG reveals:) She was accused of infiltrating Trump’s campaign on behalf of Obama. So far as I’m aware, it either didn’t happen at all, or it was done in search of criminal behavior.

    The Dumpster sneezes? Really? That’s what you’ve got?? Criminal conduct is not "sneezing,_ Mr. Gorrell. Collaborating with Russians in an attempt to change voting outcomes is not “sneezing”! Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the state? Not sneezing! Enriching yourself and your family via illegal emoluments? Not sneezing! … and more.

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    DrDon1  almost 5 years ago

    If I could, I would “flag” this piece of offal by Gorrell!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Bob Gorrell