Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller for June 10, 2019

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 5 years ago

    Law of gravity?

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    finkd  almost 5 years ago

    No problem, he’ll just take his argument to a higher court.

     •  Reply
  3. Chico2small
    peggykb9  almost 5 years ago

    This reminds me of someone, can’t think who though.

     •  Reply
  4. Psx 20180717 164642
    Watcher  almost 5 years ago

    He just broke the main law.

     •  Reply
  5. Out little avatar
    dadoctah  almost 5 years ago

    On the other hand, it does sort of play hob with the definition of “overtime parking”.

     •  Reply
  6. Sotj
    shanen0  almost 5 years ago

    Good comic, but I think “insists” would be better than “contends”. Or maybe some other verb.

     •  Reply
  7. Samvadi fb
    in.amongst  almost 5 years ago

    No wonder he is in the dock – That kind of flight sure needs a docking station.

     •  Reply
  8. L we
    Baba27  almost 5 years ago

    Seems like he took the ‘All Rise’ a bit too far.

     •  Reply
  9. Avatar 3
    pcolli  almost 5 years ago

    Too much levity it court.

     •  Reply
  10. Profile msn
    vaughnrl2003 Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    No one is above the law? What a great concept. Now if we could only enforce it.

     •  Reply
  11. Marigold insane
    johndifool  almost 5 years ago

    Looks like yet another Sovereign Citizen ended up in court…

     •  Reply
  12. Image
    magicwalnut Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Oh, for heaven’s sake. Give it a rest!

     •  Reply
  13. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  almost 5 years ago

    He is rising on a principle that is as vague as any of those published out of DC. No real foundation and no detail.

     •  Reply
  14. Nomagram
    COL Crash  almost 5 years ago

    No matter how well Laws are written and however good their intentions, someone will always be willing and able to break them.

     •  Reply
  15. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    Unless, of course, that person makes the law.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    the lost wizard  almost 5 years ago

    We’ve been floating these ideas around for while.

     •  Reply
  17. Pirate63
    Linguist  almost 5 years ago

    “Will the Defendant, please rise … erm … stand up?”

     •  Reply
  18. Foggie
    yimhere  almost 5 years ago

    Wwooohhoooo…..Wiley finally put someone (George W.?) in a picture. Thank you! Great likeness, too!! Can the Mona Lisa be far behind??

     •  Reply
  19. Noodleman 2  2
    Cornelius Noodleman  almost 5 years ago

    He must have a lot of gas!

     •  Reply
  20. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    No one.

    Well except the Trump Disciples’ Messiah.

    .

    #TraitorTrump

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    feverjr Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    The witness is obviously not aware of the gravity of the situation…

     •  Reply
  22. Smokeystover  2
    gbars70  almost 5 years ago

    YODA, a beard, he has now!

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    dsjwriter  almost 5 years ago

    The judge obviously doesn’t appreciate courtroom levity — or levitation.

     •  Reply
  24. Final mock logo  1
    D1063n35 Premium Member almost 5 years ago

    The relief from gravity is the realization that the law (karma) is imminent and transcendent. The judge sees only the illusion of manifestation (maya) not the action, thus the appearance seems like a transgression.

     •  Reply
  25. Toughcat
    bakana  almost 5 years ago

    All right, Superman, take off the fake beard and quit fooling around.

     •  Reply
  26. Missing large
    1953Baby  almost 5 years ago

    Can’t wait for the day THAT’S true. . .

     •  Reply
  27. Brain guy dancing hg clr
    Concretionist  almost 5 years ago

    Gurus often fail the “category” test because they know they’re above it all.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    Ray  almost 5 years ago

    Judges don’t contend! The parties and their attorneys do that. Judges issue rulings on the parties’ contentions.

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    jmworacle  almost 5 years ago

    Unless you are the Clintons, Obama’s, and Elizabeth Warren….

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    pieman3.14  almost 5 years ago

    Clearly not a court anywhere in the USA, then.

     •  Reply
  31. Sulky chatin
    cwg  almost 5 years ago

    Floating an ideal in court?

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    shivabones  almost 5 years ago

    Unless their name is Clinton; then the FBI will re-write the statute to cover your ass and the DOJ will go along with it.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Non Sequitur