B.C. by Mastroianni and Hart for December 22, 2016

  1. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  over 7 years ago

    But did it make a noise?

     •  Reply
  2. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Let me rephrase that… Did anybody witness it?

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Phred Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Obviously, an act of God.

     •  Reply
  4. 2006 afl collingwood
    nosirrom  over 7 years ago

    You could hear the timbre of the tree for miles.

     •  Reply
  5. 3083024 0826053922 daveb
    Kaputnik  over 7 years ago

    And how would this old question affect the insurance payout? Do you get double indemnity if it didn’t make a sound?

     •  Reply
  6. Portrait
    TossedSaladCartoon  over 7 years ago

    THANK YOU!

     •  Reply
  7. Gocomic avatar
    sandpiper  over 7 years ago

    Either way – claim denied!!

     •  Reply
  8. Jem character raya large 570x420
    cubswin2016  over 7 years ago

    There would be sound waves, but for there to be sound, someone has to be there to translate the waves into sound.

     •  Reply
  9. Great view up here
    comixbomix  over 7 years ago

    Try not to confuse “sound”, with “hearing”…

     •  Reply
  10. Picture 001
    rshive  over 7 years ago

    Not The Sound of Music, perhaps. But a sound anyway.

     •  Reply
  11. Missing large
    dflak  over 7 years ago

    This reminds me of the old joke: If a man talks in the forest, and there is no woman to hear him, is he still wrong?

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    Dr_Zinj  over 7 years ago

    If a tree falls in a forest, is it a forest anymore?

     •  Reply
  13. Jerry lakehead
    jtviper7  over 7 years ago

    The only reason it made a sound, was because BC was there to hear it.

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    PappyFiddle  over 7 years ago

    But why is the Immigration & Naturalization Service investigating a fallen tree?

     •  Reply
  15. Avatar
    neverenoughgold  over 7 years ago

    B.C. the comic was arrested for lack of evidence…

     •  Reply
  16. Nowyoulisten
    zeexenon  over 7 years ago

    Insurance man said, “Sorry you’re not covered for that. And you paid premiums for the past 40 years for peace-of-mind.”)

     •  Reply
  17. Stellers sea eagle japan 31794 100x75
    UpaCoCoCreek Premium Member over 7 years ago

    Well I didn’t hear it, claim denied!

     •  Reply
  18. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  over 7 years ago

    StevenTorrey said,

    “Things exist independent of any ‘human’ ability to hear, interpret, respond to the event. Geesh!”

    .

    Things do but somethings aren’t things, they are interpretations or are based on definitions.

    If a sound is a vibration, then all vibrations are sounds.

    Not all vibrations are sounds because there are ears incapable of hearing them.

    Therefore not all vibrations are sounds.

    .

    It depends on the definition and interpretation.

    .

    There is no beauty without someone capable of perceiving it, otherwise it may just be a sunset.

    There is no cold without someone capable of feeling it, otherwise it is simply a temperature.

    .

    The follow up which has been mentioned is one of who or what must be there to perceive it.

    Does an earthworm count? Why or why not?

    Is there a level of consciousness required? Why or why not?

    What is consciousness, anyway?

    How do we really know anything?

    How do we know how we know is right?

    How do we know how we know how we know is right?

    How far does this recursion have to go before it falls apart?

    .

    How do we know that?

    .

    Is philosophy really worth anything?

    .

    How do we define worth?

    Does worth exist independent of people?

    How do we know?

     •  Reply
  19. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  over 7 years ago

    (and, no, I’m not serious)

     •  Reply
  20. Ugly poor
    Prey  over 7 years ago

    Out FOR lunch or TO lunch?

     •  Reply
  21. 17089663590345538622707983594073
    David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault  over 7 years ago

    Pprey said,

    “Out FOR lunch or TO lunch?”

    .

    It all depends on whether you’re using “lunch” as a noun or a verb.

    In this case since it is used in conjunction with “for,” it is used as a noun.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From B.C.