Matt Bors for June 01, 2016
Transcript:
MARCH Man: I might vote for Sanders. Woman: I'm thinking Hillary. APRIL Man: You mean that phony corporate shill? Woman: Better than a naive, cranky socialist. MAY Man: Soulless neoliberal war-loving bankster puppet!! Woman: Geriatric leader of white male cult of misogyny!! JUNE Man: I mean, Trump's bad. Woman: Whoever is not Trump.
I Quit almost 8 years ago
Yep, whomever’s not Killary.
SwimsWithSharks almost 8 years ago
Did these 2 end up homeless? What did they do to their couch in 1 month?
Ivan Araque almost 8 years ago
I say there’s nothing wrong with that (and I’m for Bernie!)
Mr. Blawt almost 8 years ago
This is pretty much how the primary system works on both sides. You back your horse in the party race, then you come together and back your party in the white house race. Pretty standard stuff.
Holden Awn almost 8 years ago
Really? Which one’s which? Or as the Soviets used to joke: “Under Capitalism, man exploits man. Under Communism, it’s the other way around”
Mr. Blawt almost 8 years ago
She has been responsible for zero deaths, made-up silliness from the right-wing doesn’t count. She has answered for all of the funny make-em-ups over and over. Trump’s mob connections will matter little to you if you believe that Clinton killed people in Benghazi (for example)
andrew_c almost 8 years ago
You have to admit, that while Hillary wasn’t directly responsible for any deaths, that private email server of hers was a massive violation of state security, and she had to have known she was breaking almost as many security regulations as Chelsea Manning and Ed Snowden.
Nov Nov Man almost 8 years ago
If the nominee somehow ends up being $hillary — (I know, I know, she leads in delegates, and she has “the popular vote lead” — but if she somehow manages to overcome all the huge trust issues that keep popping up, she will lose. She has no path to victory.