Nick Anderson for June 30, 2010

  1. Missing large
    dwnoname  almost 14 years ago

    duck ‘em all, babe

     •  Reply
  2. 100 2208
    parkersinthehouse  almost 14 years ago

    hey doos she had some pretty clean responses - the answers she wouldn’t elaborate, no supreme nominee would answer -

    you can’t give an answer to “how would you rule on (blank)?” no judge would. you have to hear a case, apply the law, then rule. the questions were a little aggravating i’d say

     •  Reply
  3. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 14 years ago

    She can take Thomas a Coke.

     •  Reply
  4. Canstock3682698
    myming  almost 14 years ago

    give her a chance…

     •  Reply
  5. Exploding human fat bombs hedge 060110
    Charles Brobst Premium Member almost 14 years ago

    Pragmatism.

    Stands for nothing and for anything: “Whatever.”

     •  Reply
  6. Wombat wideweb  470x276 0
    4uk4ata  almost 14 years ago

    “And when it is found out that there was willful fraud and conspiracy committed in the preparation for that candidacy”

    Well, I’d say the willful fraud and conspiracy committed was done by those who still perpetrate that theory ;) .

     •  Reply
  7. 194345 1 260156 7
    Michigander  almost 14 years ago

    Ghostbusters stole the symbol!

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Nick Anderson