I think you are right in part; especially of religions which have as part of their doctrine the destruction and extermination of the unbelievers. However, when famines and calamities have and are affecting people around the globe the first relief efforts are made by people with religious beliefs.
What’s truly interesting is all the hatred stems from the same book, Old and New Testament teachings and prophets, as “adjusted in theme” by latter day “adherents”, spelled N-U-T-S… Mohammed was actually very egalitarian, with men and women totally equal, the followers went nuts. Jesus said he came not to bring peace to the world, but a sword, a sad statement after the message of the Sermon on the Mount, that most Christian sects have actually taken to heart above “love thy neighbor”.
Buddhism teaches respect for all people, and other religions, even if agreeing to disagree, especially when those other religions start preaching violence, against anyone. I certainly respect the teachings and advice of the Dalai Lama over any of the “screamers” on TV, or in the streets, going against the teachings of both Jesus and Mohammed; just a thought.
The outrageous violence and hatred, and well, the greed of the rabbis, in the laws of Moses in Deuteronomy and elsewhere in that “old book of hate”, aren’t exactly a model for peace within the family, let alone the greater population at large.. Yep, they “tick you off” in any way, and “God” commands you to stone ’em to death. NOT exactly a gentle hand (especially toward gentiles).
That is the single greatest absurdity. I assure you, were there no religion whatsoever, there would be every bit as much war, greed, abuse and random violence. Violent people would simply find a different excuse.
I respect the Society of Friends for many of their positions. I find it interesting that most religious texts are taken literally or figuratively, as the follower decides appropriate for the moment. As to Buddhism, I take the Dalai Lama’s writings on that, not Widepedia, and Tibetan Buddhists are the branch I tend to support. Hiroshima, Dresden, Auschwitz, Gaza, all show “restraint”?? It’s important to note that Hitler was a Roman Catholic, and their motto was “Gott mit Uns”. As to Shinto and the “god” emperor? nah.
canFunny over 9 years ago
I think you are right in part; especially of religions which have as part of their doctrine the destruction and extermination of the unbelievers. However, when famines and calamities have and are affecting people around the globe the first relief efforts are made by people with religious beliefs.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
What’s truly interesting is all the hatred stems from the same book, Old and New Testament teachings and prophets, as “adjusted in theme” by latter day “adherents”, spelled N-U-T-S… Mohammed was actually very egalitarian, with men and women totally equal, the followers went nuts. Jesus said he came not to bring peace to the world, but a sword, a sad statement after the message of the Sermon on the Mount, that most Christian sects have actually taken to heart above “love thy neighbor”.
Buddhism teaches respect for all people, and other religions, even if agreeing to disagree, especially when those other religions start preaching violence, against anyone. I certainly respect the teachings and advice of the Dalai Lama over any of the “screamers” on TV, or in the streets, going against the teachings of both Jesus and Mohammed; just a thought.
The outrageous violence and hatred, and well, the greed of the rabbis, in the laws of Moses in Deuteronomy and elsewhere in that “old book of hate”, aren’t exactly a model for peace within the family, let alone the greater population at large.. Yep, they “tick you off” in any way, and “God” commands you to stone ’em to death. NOT exactly a gentle hand (especially toward gentiles).
cdward over 9 years ago
That is the single greatest absurdity. I assure you, were there no religion whatsoever, there would be every bit as much war, greed, abuse and random violence. Violent people would simply find a different excuse.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
I respect the Society of Friends for many of their positions. I find it interesting that most religious texts are taken literally or figuratively, as the follower decides appropriate for the moment. As to Buddhism, I take the Dalai Lama’s writings on that, not Widepedia, and Tibetan Buddhists are the branch I tend to support. Hiroshima, Dresden, Auschwitz, Gaza, all show “restraint”?? It’s important to note that Hitler was a Roman Catholic, and their motto was “Gott mit Uns”. As to Shinto and the “god” emperor? nah.