The thing is, the bankers already got their money through a government bailout. That’s money from you and me folks. And if they didn’t need that bailout, why did the President give them the money in the first place? Sounds like lousy accounting practices to me, or maybe there was some deception on somebody’s part? And how do the bank executives rate bonuses if the banks were failing? Didn’t the executives deserve to be fired for poor performance? Sounds like a very poor decision on the part of the President in the first place.
This move your money movement has their attention
Has anyone noticed the “what a nice guy we are ” ads on the web from BOA ? Bragging about 1.5 TRILLION in ” charitable work ” WUT?
But for all the ranting against the bankers, to which I add my indignation, I do wonder if any of us would be co-opted if we were given a nice amount of cash to change our opinions.
Maybe we shouldn’t criticize them too harshly huh..
worry not for the bankers, the anti-tax fox noose will speak for their-“tax rights”. yet another check they’ll say a an ADDED tax on the “middle class”.
banks and speculators create NO wealth, only labor creates wealth.
Arrggh. The bailout was passed by Congress in Oct. 2008. For those with even shorter memories than some of the posters here, Bush was still president in Oct. 2008. The bailout concept and legislation was written and structured by hank Paulsen, Bush’s Treasury Secretary.
Lt_Lanier over 14 years ago
With the way the financial sector is in the Democrat’s back pockets, I wouldn’t doubt that it recycles…
d_legendary1 over 14 years ago
Nobody minds that the government takes care of coins and the federal reserve handles the cash.
comYics over 14 years ago
That appears to be a 40oz in Obamas hands :)).
I hope he isn’t that greedy and self consumed.
sirrom567 over 14 years ago
That’s not Obama. Ted always draws him a certain way, and that’s not it.
comYics over 14 years ago
Ah, I was looking at that bailout part.
Gangsteroflove over 14 years ago
The thing is, the bankers already got their money through a government bailout. That’s money from you and me folks. And if they didn’t need that bailout, why did the President give them the money in the first place? Sounds like lousy accounting practices to me, or maybe there was some deception on somebody’s part? And how do the bank executives rate bonuses if the banks were failing? Didn’t the executives deserve to be fired for poor performance? Sounds like a very poor decision on the part of the President in the first place.
meowdam over 14 years ago
This move your money movement has their attention Has anyone noticed the “what a nice guy we are ” ads on the web from BOA ? Bragging about 1.5 TRILLION in ” charitable work ” WUT?
edmondd over 14 years ago
lol @ the cartoon it’s funny Ted!
But for all the ranting against the bankers, to which I add my indignation, I do wonder if any of us would be co-opted if we were given a nice amount of cash to change our opinions.
Maybe we shouldn’t criticize them too harshly huh..
jaxaction over 14 years ago
worry not for the bankers, the anti-tax fox noose will speak for their-“tax rights”. yet another check they’ll say a an ADDED tax on the “middle class”. banks and speculators create NO wealth, only labor creates wealth.
believecommonsense over 14 years ago
Arrggh. The bailout was passed by Congress in Oct. 2008. For those with even shorter memories than some of the posters here, Bush was still president in Oct. 2008. The bailout concept and legislation was written and structured by hank Paulsen, Bush’s Treasury Secretary.