Adam@Home by Rob Harrell for March 07, 2014
March 06, 2014
March 08, 2014
Transcript:
Adam: I think you need to take a break from this game. Clayton: What? Why? Adam: It's teaching you that the way to deal with annoying people is through violence. Throwing that bags of chips at me will only prove my point. Clayton: Dang.
gary4160 about 10 years ago
my dad would have pulled off his belt and add more violence for the disrespect.
kraftjeff about 10 years ago
Ok… I will throw a fit instead :D
Dani Rice about 10 years ago
No matter, it’s still nowhere near “Grand Theft Auto”.
sbchamp about 10 years ago
“It’s NOT?!”
ChessPirate about 10 years ago
In the spirit of the game, wouldn’t he be going to bop Adam with it?
MontanaLady about 10 years ago
And, if he threw that bag o’ chips, he’d only have to clean up the mess himself. So, why bother.
Dunwich Premium Member about 10 years ago
Isn’t the game actually teaching him to release pent up anger through a virtual and non-harmful form of entertainment? Wouldn’t a good counselor or parent guide a child to the conclusion that it is good to release these emotions, but to do so in a manner that is either productive or not harmful to either the target or the child? Why are these games seen as the genesis of violence as opposed to a response to real world violence? and can they not in truth work both ways?
Boots at the Boar Premium Member about 10 years ago
I played a lot of Mortal Kombat as a teenager. I have yet to rip out someone’s spine. I’ve played a lot of Grand Theft Auto as a young adult. I have yet to steal a car, murder a hooker, or challenge a kid to a RC helicopter race.