Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for March 10, 2014

  1. Missing large
    delpatjr  about 10 years ago

    No we don’t.

     •  Reply
  2. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  about 10 years ago

    The shark is as equally dumb as those crocodiles (except that one’s wife and son).

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    legaleagle48  about 10 years ago

    Yes, we do (and cue the argument in 3…2..1!)

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large 2
    Phatts  about 10 years ago

    What’s the shark worried about ocean levels? Looks to me like he’s not having any troubles getting around on land.

     •  Reply
  5. Thinker
    Sisyphos  about 10 years ago

    I don’t deal with door-too-door solicitors (to give them a polite name)….

     •  Reply
  6. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Doesn’t warming increase the amount of water not at the common level, actually reducing the sea levels? That’s how it works in a universe where the laws of thermodynamics are in force. Feel free to argue against the basic laws of physics, though. Climate is a special case.

     •  Reply
  7. German typewriter detail small
    Cheapskate0  about 10 years ago

    Anybody remember a political cartoon a few years ago? About global warming, it featured rich people wondering why people were complaining about global warming – as they enjoyed their beach vacations.- in Antarctica!

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Alan Rees  about 10 years ago

    The melting of sea ice would not affect the level of the oceans in either direction. It is the ice that is up on the land (i.e. glaciers) that is the problem, and most of Antarctic is covered in an immense ice sheet that is an AVERAGE of about 7,000 feet — over a mile — thick. When that melts, the resulting melt-water runs off the land and into the ocean, raising the levels. It is unlikely that it would ever ALL melt, but (despite the impressions gullible people got from the research ship caught in the ice recently) significant melt-off is occurring in some parts of Antarctica. See the following website for a reasonably neutral discussion of the matter: http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geophysics/question473.htm

     •  Reply
  9. Luhm 2 27 10
    Mopman  about 10 years ago

    I assume you mean the ice melts as opposed to the water melts. Flaw in your argument – water level does not decrease when floating ice melts. Put an ice cube in a glass of water. Let it melt. The water level in the glass will stay the same, not go down. That is “simple physical reality”. #2, There is a huge amount of ice that is NOT floating in the water, such as glaciers. When they break off and slide into the ocean (or melt into it from land) that’s where the rise comes from, added volume. Libs can figure out that simple fact.

     •  Reply
  10. 20071112 einstein
    hariseldon59  about 10 years ago

    Exactly. Also, another factor involved is that water reaches a maximum density at 4 degrees C (39 F). Above this temperature, the density decreases with increasing temperature. So an increase of a few degrees would cause liquid water to expand, and ocean levels to rise.

     •  Reply
  11. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    Those land sharks are the most dangerous ones.

     •  Reply
  12. Hillbilly1
    Hillbillyman  about 10 years ago

    That shark looked little like Al Gore!

     •  Reply
  13. 20071112 einstein
    hariseldon59  about 10 years ago

    Are you sure its not Chevy Chase in disguise?

     •  Reply
  14. Missing large
    Malcolm Hall  about 10 years ago

    Did someone actually write that the more liquid water on Earth, the lower the sea level will be?

     •  Reply
  15. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    CCNJ how exactly does “water melt?” Generally water in its solid state is referred to as “ice” not water even if it still is…

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Reppr Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Do flounder flounder? And is the plural (of the fish) flounder or flounders? Help! My comment is floundering.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    bubjerryk  about 10 years ago

    Science has not referred to it as “Global Warming” for years, since some areas will experience times of extreme cold (Midwest USA this winter?) – the proper name is “Global Climate Change”

     •  Reply
  18. Airbrush 20240305192116
    Number Three  about 10 years ago

    I like Carbano’s innocent look in the 2nd panel.

    xxx

     •  Reply
  19. Inkblot2
    Ink blot Premium Member about 10 years ago

    While there was certainly no “scientific concensus” regarding global cooling or an “impending ice age”; some scientists were talking about it, in the late 1970’s, to early 1980’s.

     •  Reply
  20. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    Water vapor in the atmosphere is steam. That is gaseous water. It would be more correctly called “wet steam” as it is a combination of water and water vapor..At least that is the correct engineering / scientific term for it per Mollier’s description and diagramming:.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mollier_diagram

     •  Reply
  21. Duck1275
    Brass Orchid Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Sea ice has nothing to do with sea levels. Sea levels can only be altered by having more water raised above sea level than exists at sea level. Physics again. Air temps are not that significant, and can be appreciably higher in the absence of fresh water caused by oceanic cooling. Imagine that. Cooler oceans can cause atmospheric warming by decreasing the amount of evaporation taking place with a constant input of solar radiation. This results in lower atmospheric H2O, meaning less precipitation and less available fresh water for converting heat energy to kinetic energy by the state change of water, especially from green plants, which need that water. Cooler oceans mean growing deserts, shrinking glaciers and general increases in atmospheric warming.Again, physics.

     •  Reply
  22. Right here
    Sherlock Watson  about 10 years ago

    Candygram!

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    vogonpoetry  about 10 years ago

    Global warming is a hoax…climate change is real.

     •  Reply
  24. Logo
    Chris Sherlock  about 10 years ago

    “Hullo zeeba neighba.”

     •  Reply
  25. Dicktracy silhouetteed
    Spade Jr.  about 10 years ago

    I went dynamite fishing today. All I caught were 3 firecrackers. Lousy day in the boat.

     •  Reply
  26. Angel cat
    noreenklose  about 10 years ago

    Blame the Sun. Nothing we can do, even ASSUMING that global warming malarkey is true. WE (mankind) ARE NOT THE CAUSE.

     •  Reply
  27. 137
    Comicmaaan  over 7 years ago

    Thats disturbing and I don’t know why…

     •  Reply
  28. Seedotwallpaper
    Caedmon The Great  over 3 years ago

    Poor Zebra, everybodys out for him

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    alantain  11 months ago

    Never trust a smiling shark.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Pearls Before Swine