That is Priceless by Steve Melcher for January 15, 2014

  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 10 years ago

    Some friend!

     •  Reply
  2. Gigglesb
    tattooedcyberidiot  about 10 years ago

    That’s the Baskerville Cursor

     •  Reply
  3. Large dd2
    zero  about 10 years ago

    Mary, Mary where you going to…

     •  Reply
  4. 16873788307 800b4ae7a8 b
    Last Rose Of Summer Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Not going well, she doesn’t look interested.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    watmiwori  about 10 years ago

    Dirty old monks need love too! Especially if not all that old.

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  about 10 years ago

    Looks like Watson may be getting a “Dear John” letter…

     •  Reply
  7. Black lion
    PICTO  about 10 years ago

    No,no silly girl, it’s only ten inches, I said the game was a foot…

     •  Reply
  8. Avatar 3
    pcolli  about 10 years ago

    “I have deduced that the child cannot possibly be mine, as I was at Lo Ling Nan’s opium den at the time. By virtue of logical deduction, I suggest that the father must be…….”

     •  Reply
  9. Hacking dog original
    J Short  about 10 years ago

    This wasn’t the first time Sherlock hounded Susie Baskerville.

     •  Reply
  10. Barnette
    Enoki  about 10 years ago

    He’s just her drug dealer and trying to get a fix…

     •  Reply
  11. Picture 22
    jack fairbanks  about 10 years ago

    Sherlock dear, now that we’ve tried the “alum-entry”, you’re not going to insist that I return to men’s clothing are you?

     •  Reply
  12. Me 2015
    puddlesplatt  about 10 years ago

    But I’m telling you, I’m Gay!

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    Reality,really?  about 10 years ago

    All my bags are packed I’m ready to go…. PP&M

     •  Reply
  14. Gustave courbet   le d sesp r
    mabrndt Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Click-to-enlarge image can be found here, or at Mr. Melcher’s blog entry (no cursor).Yes is privately owned. Two versions exist; but, when sold at auction, garnered vastly different prices.Sadly, neither the auction records of the first nor second include an image. Both were dated, the first as 1877, the second as just 77. According to the records, the first has a signature, but not the second.I haven’t been able to spot a date or signature on neither this painting, nor in the image of the other version, found here (along with many other works, with descriptions of some), nor in the many different colorations available online.Both versions start at 6:09 into this video of the artist’s works (fullscreen is active):

    The artist’s Wikipedia page and collection (more under Subcategories at each level).Fourth, of the 9 works, by this artist, that have, so far, appeared in Mr. Melcher’s blog, to also appear here.P.S. If like me, you hadn’t heard the word macking before (guess I’m getting old), the Urban Dictionary has a definition that dates back to 2002, as well as several other forms/uses, listed in the left margin.
     •  Reply
  15. Chai
    Perkycat  about 10 years ago

    I had never heard the work ‘macking’ but I looked it up and now I know.

     •  Reply
  16. C53dea45 0301 4c83 825e 752a646f6595 236 00000009d87191be tmp
    katzenbooks45  about 10 years ago

    Rerun?

     •  Reply
  17. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  about 10 years ago

    “Ce n’est pas une pipe.”

     •  Reply
  18. Avatar1 65
    Snoopy_Fan  about 10 years ago

    “HOLMES! WATCH OUT FOR THAT ARROW!!!”

     •  Reply
  19. Gustave courbet   le d sesp r
    mabrndt Premium Member about 10 years ago

    Here is another work by this artist.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From That is Priceless