Free Range by Bill Whitehead for November 13, 2013

  1. Fruit 200x200
    jsab0  over 10 years ago

    ain’t it a shamehe forgot to disclaimthe danger of flame

    it wasn’t his aimto injure and maimor to leave lame

    if it’s all the samerather than blamesee life’s karmic game

     •  Reply
  2. Ricky ricardo oh lucy
    edclectic  over 10 years ago

    Warning labels are not foolproof.

     •  Reply
  3. Hold still i gotcha homie 28918 1250050600 0
    Aussie Down Under  over 10 years ago

    Some labels are so not needed unless the manufacturer is targeting people who are mentally impaired. Like don’t put perfume in your iron, just use water. Who in their right mind would ever consider ironing with perfume???

     •  Reply
  4. Mr burns
    paultolfree  over 10 years ago

    I had a packet of peanuts that carried the warning ‘may contain nuts’

     •  Reply
  5. C53dea45 0301 4c83 825e 752a646f6595 236 00000009d87191be tmp
    katzenbooks45  over 10 years ago

    Just when you think you’ve made it idiot-proof, they invent a better idiot.

     •  Reply
  6. Irish  1
    Zen-of-Zinfandel  over 10 years ago

    10,000 years and 1000 lawsuits later, “Caution Hot!” was printed on the beverage cup.

     •  Reply
  7. Opy
    xpurplezebra  over 10 years ago

    He’s off the hook. Was discovered, not invented.

     •  Reply
  8. Idiocracy  1
    Dave Ferro  over 10 years ago

    They must be in California (or what would become California)… This is where all these stupid warning labels come from. There is a warning sticker on packages of lead fishing lures/sinkers warning that it contains lead.. Really?!? I never would have guessed that lead fishing sinkers had lead in them. Nor solder (solder contains tin/lead). I’m glad we have these warnings as I would never have known. Duh.

     •  Reply
  9. King crimson   1969   in the court of the crimson king   front
    aerilim  over 10 years ago

    Lawyers, they come with time…..

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Free Range