If the “radical right” is so in favor of the Constitution, why do they say “NO!” to every freedom it offers? Oh, right, if THEY get what THEY want, that’s freedom, even if everyone else does lose. Sorry, but the TEA party (as it has morphed) represents the “RINO” wingnut brigade that Ike, Nixon, and even “Saint Reagan” wouldn’t recognize, or accept.
Now, tigger honey pie, that is irrelevant. It makes no difference that he may or may not attended a same sex marriage, or not. It is relevant a large group of Americans are no longer being denied their rights based upon religion, hatred and being uninformed.
I haven’t seen that dtroutma is against Amendment 2. The part some leave out is about it addressing a “Well Regulated Militia”. Please explain how that part is irrelevant
Marriage is a civil contract between two consenting adults. Let the religious aspect be called something else, I suggest Holy Unions. That way, any two consenting adults can be married, opposite or same sex. Both can use "I’m married to X.
Enoki over 10 years ago
Something irrelevant.
pstampfel Premium Member over 10 years ago
something perfect.
pirate227 over 10 years ago
It only became irrelevant when you lost.
Dtroutma over 10 years ago
If the “radical right” is so in favor of the Constitution, why do they say “NO!” to every freedom it offers? Oh, right, if THEY get what THEY want, that’s freedom, even if everyone else does lose. Sorry, but the TEA party (as it has morphed) represents the “RINO” wingnut brigade that Ike, Nixon, and even “Saint Reagan” wouldn’t recognize, or accept.
cjr53 over 10 years ago
Now, tigger honey pie, that is irrelevant. It makes no difference that he may or may not attended a same sex marriage, or not. It is relevant a large group of Americans are no longer being denied their rights based upon religion, hatred and being uninformed.
cjr53 over 10 years ago
I haven’t seen that dtroutma is against Amendment 2. The part some leave out is about it addressing a “Well Regulated Militia”. Please explain how that part is irrelevant
OmqR-IV.0 over 10 years ago
said “Sounds pretty straightforward to me”
That’s what it sounds like to them, too. Therefore not “gayforward” and that sticks in their throats.
Enoki over 10 years ago
Keep wishing! Oh, buy lottery tickets too. You have a better chance of winning…
cjr53 over 10 years ago
Marriage is a civil contract between two consenting adults. Let the religious aspect be called something else, I suggest Holy Unions. That way, any two consenting adults can be married, opposite or same sex. Both can use "I’m married to X.