Conservatives, anticipating that Obama will take some sort of military action, are lining up solidly against taking military action. It would be hilarious if Obama decided NOT to take military action. There would be many dislocated joints.
“…..So, if Obama goes up or down, the rwnj know for certain that should be an impeachable offence. ….”.So its win win for the conservatives. Maybe, but I wouldn’t discount Obama’s ability to think of a way out.
“……spending more in his first 6 months in office than all the presidents combined….”.The money being spent was congressionally approved programed spending authorized by previous administrations. If Obama had frozen that spending, then he could have been impeached for violating the Constitution.
D’s and R’s are being involved, but probably not publicly. Neither side is too thrilled about making it a public debate. If based on new information Obama has to change positions, he will and he will convince the American people it is the right thing to do. This is a complicated mess and Obama is not dumb.
“…….In that case, they will all change their opinions and attack Obama for NOT taking military action……”.That’s when you will see the conservative population dislocating various body parts as they do back flips, flip flops, and fancy pirouettes as they stumble over themselves reversing positions. Most entertaining!
Uh, just a slight added note of history: it was GHW Bush who sent our troops into Somalia, to back a warlord we knew nothing about, in a situation we knew very little about, and choosing a side was stupid. Hmmmm let’s all now say SYRIA!
“…….Since you are such a Constitutional expert, Gypsy, tell us how parts of ACA do not violate the Constitution……”.Why are you asking me when you can ask the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who has already given his ruling?
And Harley proves he knows as little about Shinto as Islam, or any other religion, like well that “right hand of God” – the Pope – to Roman Catholics?
Which, it IS all the “religious” in this country, insulting the “religious” (by killing them with bombers, drones, rockets, and weapons far more terrible than Sarin or VX) of other countries, that has gotten the U.S. into most of our foreign wars of late. It is NOT a “war on terror” it IS a “war on Islam”, and Muslims HAVE seen the message, which is why we’ve done nothing but throw gas on the fire.
While Bosnia-Herzgovenia and Kosovo are hardly a totally peaceful place, at least Clinton took action to slow, if not stop, the Christians killing Muslims, and vice versa. And, he didn’t get our people killed in the process. It’s tiresome hearing “conservatives” who backed mass murder, whine about Benghazi, or trying for a diplomatic solution in Syria, or anywhere else.
We have islamists killing islamists.I can’t imagine anything better going on in the Mideast.let’s sell weapons to both sides and keep encouraging them. it keeps the war over there, and the parties sworn to kill us are killing each other instead.Since this is clearly Obama’s doing, i’d say he’s brilliant!
Here’s a quotation from August 14th: “I don’t usually do this, but you are a moron.” And today, “You are a moron.” Well, it’s been a couple of weeks, so maybe you don’t count that as “usually”. As for your behind, if you don’t know it’s been bit, I guess you’re a little insensitive back there.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
Conservatives, anticipating that Obama will take some sort of military action, are lining up solidly against taking military action. It would be hilarious if Obama decided NOT to take military action. There would be many dislocated joints.
twhalen over 10 years ago
The Battle of Mogadishu on which “Blackhawk Down” was based happned in 1993 under Bill Clinton.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
“…..So, if Obama goes up or down, the rwnj know for certain that should be an impeachable offence. ….”.So its win win for the conservatives. Maybe, but I wouldn’t discount Obama’s ability to think of a way out.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
“……spending more in his first 6 months in office than all the presidents combined….”.The money being spent was congressionally approved programed spending authorized by previous administrations. If Obama had frozen that spending, then he could have been impeached for violating the Constitution.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
D’s and R’s are being involved, but probably not publicly. Neither side is too thrilled about making it a public debate. If based on new information Obama has to change positions, he will and he will convince the American people it is the right thing to do. This is a complicated mess and Obama is not dumb.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
Don’t judge him by Bush’s character.
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
“…….In that case, they will all change their opinions and attack Obama for NOT taking military action……”.That’s when you will see the conservative population dislocating various body parts as they do back flips, flip flops, and fancy pirouettes as they stumble over themselves reversing positions. Most entertaining!
Fuzzy Thinker Premium Member over 10 years ago
One way out of this mess is for al-Assad to invite UN to come in and take possession of the chemical weapons.
Dtroutma over 10 years ago
Uh, just a slight added note of history: it was GHW Bush who sent our troops into Somalia, to back a warlord we knew nothing about, in a situation we knew very little about, and choosing a side was stupid. Hmmmm let’s all now say SYRIA!
anonim over 10 years ago
Did you really draw them with crooked teeth? Sheesh
Gypsy8 over 10 years ago
“…….Since you are such a Constitutional expert, Gypsy, tell us how parts of ACA do not violate the Constitution……”.Why are you asking me when you can ask the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who has already given his ruling?
Dtroutma over 10 years ago
And Harley proves he knows as little about Shinto as Islam, or any other religion, like well that “right hand of God” – the Pope – to Roman Catholics?
Which, it IS all the “religious” in this country, insulting the “religious” (by killing them with bombers, drones, rockets, and weapons far more terrible than Sarin or VX) of other countries, that has gotten the U.S. into most of our foreign wars of late. It is NOT a “war on terror” it IS a “war on Islam”, and Muslims HAVE seen the message, which is why we’ve done nothing but throw gas on the fire.
While Bosnia-Herzgovenia and Kosovo are hardly a totally peaceful place, at least Clinton took action to slow, if not stop, the Christians killing Muslims, and vice versa. And, he didn’t get our people killed in the process. It’s tiresome hearing “conservatives” who backed mass murder, whine about Benghazi, or trying for a diplomatic solution in Syria, or anywhere else.
lonecat over 10 years ago
The last time you called someone a moron your post turned around and bit you on the behind.
dannysixpack over 10 years ago
We have islamists killing islamists.I can’t imagine anything better going on in the Mideast.let’s sell weapons to both sides and keep encouraging them. it keeps the war over there, and the parties sworn to kill us are killing each other instead.Since this is clearly Obama’s doing, i’d say he’s brilliant!
Dtroutma over 10 years ago
Name a NON-Muslim nation (or group, or individual) we’ve attacked since launching our “war on terror”.
lonecat over 10 years ago
Here’s a quotation from August 14th: “I don’t usually do this, but you are a moron.” And today, “You are a moron.” Well, it’s been a couple of weeks, so maybe you don’t count that as “usually”. As for your behind, if you don’t know it’s been bit, I guess you’re a little insensitive back there.